
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Manhattan, KS 66502
Posts: 599
|
Although i'm not quite in everyone else's league as far as mods go (yet...) my Pro-M 87mm MAF definately helped. From what i've done so far, the MAF might seem like a waste of money but I got it very cheap along with FMS pulleys so I couldn't pass up the deal. Setting aside all the little pro's and con's of both meters I would think either would be a good choice.
Gains? Who knows. It definatley feels faster but i've never had it on a dyno. Brett ------------------ 66 Tahoe Turquoise Coupe Laser Red 96GT Ragtop 30 Years & 30 inches apart in the driveway! |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 80mm MAF on a Stock 5.0 ?? | Katmandu | Windsor Power | 2 | 07-20-2003 07:18 PM |
| WHY is a 80mm MAF and cold air induction a bad combination?? | 96_4.6 | Modular Madness | 6 | 03-09-2003 02:19 AM |
| which MAF? 73mm, 76mm, 80mm?? | acidangel316 | Windsor Power | 8 | 06-19-2001 02:37 PM |
| After Pro-M 80mm & PIH kit (poor & surging idle) ??????? | HAITHAM | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-28-2001 07:17 PM |
| PIH kit & 80mm MAF | HAITHAM | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-13-2001 08:38 AM |
