MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Modular Madness
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-11-2001, 08:32 PM   #1
MrGtStang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Valdosta,Ga
Posts: 16
Post Remove Intake Silencer on 4.6?

Hello, Ive Been in Mustangs for Longer then I Could Drive But This is My First 4.6,
So i feel like a kid again with this questions im imbarresed LOL..

Does removing the Air Intake Silencer On the 4.6 Help like it does on the 5.0's?
Cause i THINK I Heard that it could hurt performance Rather then Help it?

So Hook a New 4.6 Guy with some Info..

wow i feel 9 years old again LOL

2001 Bullitt
MrGtStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2001, 12:32 AM   #2
T_Bone
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Minot AFB, ND
Posts: 207
Post

Well, you could always take it off and try it. If you don't like the results, then put it back on. It only takes a few minutes.
I removed it on my GT and Cobra. If nothing else, it sounds cool at WOT, hearing the air whistling into the intake, heh.
Some ppl claim to have dyno'd 1-2 hp higher with it removed. I've never heard of anyone losing power without it.

------------------
T-Bones 1997 Cobra#6342 born 6-11-97
Wht/blk, Pro 5.0,FRPP 4.56's, aluminum driveshaft, FRPP throttle body, C&L 80mm MAF, K&N, Steeda U/D pulleys, Steeda timing adjuster, Flowmasters, s/f connectors, FRPP pro springs, BBK caster/cambers.

My old 96GT
T_Bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2001, 11:21 AM   #3
blue00gt
Mustang Addict
 
blue00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
Post

I've seen dyno results that indicate a 2-3 hp loss when you remove the intake silencer on a 99+ GT without changing to a cold air induction.
blue00gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2001, 03:17 PM   #4
gorgasb
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lowell, IN
Posts: 3
Cool

I have a 97 4.6, I just took mine off and to me, it felt a bit faster. I could really tell the difference!
gorgasb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2001, 05:30 PM   #5
Red Mustang Gt 46
13.3 @ 103
 
Red Mustang Gt 46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 253
Post

Haven't seen a loss but I can tell you with a removed silencer or a modified silencer (mine is modified) you will the notice the RPMs climb quicker. Prior to modifying my silencer, it felt like the engine was just making noise, after modifying it...VRRRRRROOOOMMMM!! I cut 3" off the end of mine and placed a 4" tube in it to extend into the fenderwell.

------------------
1998 Mustang Gt
C&L 80mm
Steeda Underdrives
Steeda Tri-Ax
Magnaflows

Red Mustang Gt 46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2001, 06:27 PM   #6
blue00gt
Mustang Addict
 
blue00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
Post

I just noticed that you have a Bullit rather than a normal '01 GT, so it's hard to say. According to the magazines, removing the intake silencer was always worth a couple horsepower on any '86 and up car until they tried it on the '99 and up and lost a couple horsepower. Since the Bullit has a different intake setup, it's hard to say. I'd try it and see.
blue00gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2001, 09:51 AM   #7
Rocket 99GT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: gaithersburg md, 20879 usa
Posts: 120
Post

no difference found.

.............................................99GT…
rear sway bar (adjustable)
rear lower control arm
traction bars,
tokiko struts illumina 5 position,
tokiko shocks,
caster camber plates
racing lower springs
3:73
strut tower brace
underdrive pulleys
Michelin “pilot XGT-Z4. 245x17
No silencer
No spare tire


Rocket 99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2001, 05:58 PM   #8
Mustangmom2k
Registered Member
 
Mustangmom2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 73
Smile

Quote:
Hello, Ive Been in Mustangs for Longer then I Could Drive But This is My First 4.6
Me, too!

Took mine off. I have never dynoed my car, so I can't tell for sure. However, the butt-o-meter felt a slight increase in giddy-up. I am actually planning on puting it back on, now that I know the feel of my car, just to see if there's any difference.

I have read a LOT on this, and there is much controversy. Personally, I go with what I feel in the seat of the pants.


------------------
"Back in the day" owned a '66 289 and later a black '68 289.
Current - '00 white GT w/K&N and Flowmasters. Otherwise bone stock.
ET-13.952@98.87 RT-.507 60'-2.09
Son #1 - '87 GT stock
Son #2 - '89 LX 5.0 stock



[This message has been edited by Mustangmom2k (edited 05-18-2001).]
Mustangmom2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
removing intake mak375 Windsor Power 4 04-09-2003 02:05 PM
Head and intake flow. Something to think about. :) 5ohCOUPE Windsor Power 3 03-16-2003 08:52 AM
4.6L Intake spacer!!!! skz4u Modular Madness 18 01-27-2003 11:11 PM
02' Intake Silencer? MiracleMax Modular Madness 3 10-25-2001 11:10 AM
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? gt93mustang Windsor Power 14 03-06-2001 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.


SEARCH