© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-01-2006, 06:12 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1
|
Heads, is bigger better?
I currently own a 2003 GT, and have some bolt ons but wanted to take it up a notch and add some heads. Ive been considering and comparing, Fox Lakes stage 2 heads and patriot performance's stage 3 heads. The Fox Lake heads feature 2.23intake and 1.95 exhaust valves, the PPstage3's 1.84 and 1.45. Does bigger automatically mean better? Am i getting in over my head by not beefing up the lower end first? Anyways any help offered here would help me make my decision. Thank you...
|
07-03-2006, 04:27 PM | #2 |
I'm slow ...I know.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 518
|
Re: Heads, is bigger better?
all motor applications end up being expensive
if it were me personally i would get the base vortech kit
__________________
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all... |
07-15-2006, 02:07 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: moorpark ca
Posts: 340
|
Re: Heads, is bigger better?
I've read in multiple places that Patriot's heads are lacking in quality, specifically the valve guides leaking/coming loose. Most guys seem to like Fox lake or VT heads.
To answer your question, bigger is rarely better especially if your car is a daily driver. The larger the ports and valves, usually means the car will make greater power but it shifts the power higher and higher up in the rpm band and the lower end of the rpm band loses power. You need to deside what you want from the car. If max hp is your goal then get bigger, if you want an all around fun car that has more power, get slightly bigger. jmho. I'm going to headswap my 98 gt and get fox lake stage 1's and comp cams 262ah. I feel it will improve the power all through the powerband which will make a fun daily driver. jmho. Leon
__________________
03 sonic blue cobra coupe, 11.49@122mph bakerfield raceway! 11.67@120mph fontana 98 GT, stock for now. |
08-01-2006, 06:23 AM | #4 |
13.3 @ 103
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 253
|
Re: Heads, is bigger better?
With stock compression or no boost (S/C) I wouldn't say it would be worth it...
"46stang" I just sold my 268's...ever consider them? great mid-range power.
__________________
Equipment by: Steeda C&L COMP CAMS FRPP MSD Bassani Magnaflow MAC |
08-01-2006, 05:53 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: moorpark ca
Posts: 340
|
Re: Heads, is bigger better?
I need it to idle like or as near as stock as possible for CA. smog laws. I think the 262's will be perfect for my needs. Thanks.
Leon
__________________
03 sonic blue cobra coupe, 11.49@122mph bakerfield raceway! 11.67@120mph fontana 98 GT, stock for now. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
will 99-2002 cams out of the pi heads fit in the 96-98 stock heads | slow98 | Modular Madness | 6 | 10-25-2002 04:28 PM |
GT-40 heads | 5.0 Pony | Windsor Power | 1 | 09-10-2002 10:26 PM |
What kind of Windsor heads? | vetteeatr | Windsor Power | 11 | 10-28-2001 03:43 AM |
My NEW replacement Holley heads are different! | Rick 91GT | Windsor Power | 8 | 04-23-2001 06:45 AM |