mm panhard bar and lca with stock uca?

spinemup · 11-06-2000, 10:53 AM

should i do this or wait untill i can afford the tourque arm too?

------------------

THE MIGHTY NOTCH

drudis · 11-06-2000, 04:47 PM

You will get conflicting reports on this. Yeah, it does induce a bind in the rear suspension, And yeah, it does help center the rear axle and and change the roll center of the rear of the car.
IMOHO, for a street car, I would do it. For a track car, wait till you save all your pennies.

------------------
Darius Rudis
Roadracer: Home built t-arm/panhard suspension powered by an S-trimmed motor :-)
My Mustang Page

Skankin · 11-07-2000, 03:54 PM

The MM arms are backwards. You'd have less bind (free articulation) with the granatelli/ground pounder arms or the www.wmsracing.com race arms.

11-06-2000, 10:53 AM	#1
spinemup Registered Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: middleboro,ma, usa Posts: 734	mm panhard bar and lca with stock uca? should i do this or wait untill i can afford the tourque arm too? ------------------ THE MIGHTY NOTCH

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

11-06-2000, 04:47 PM	#2
drudis Moderator Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Livonia, MI, USA Posts: 1,194	You will get conflicting reports on this. Yeah, it does induce a bind in the rear suspension, And yeah, it does help center the rear axle and and change the roll center of the rear of the car. IMOHO, for a street car, I would do it. For a track car, wait till you save all your pennies. ------------------ Darius Rudis Roadracer: Home built t-arm/panhard suspension powered by an S-trimmed motor :-) My Mustang Page

11-07-2000, 03:54 PM	#3
Skankin Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,349	The MM arms are backwards. You'd have less bind (free articulation) with the granatelli/ground pounder arms or the www.wmsracing.com race arms.