MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-08-2001, 01:36 AM   #1
yusuf
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 56
Post handling

I have a '65 with decent power (360 to the tire), but I feel that the chassis isn't up to it. I put on subframe connectors, adjustable shocks, the "Shelby" handling mod, but it still feels overpowered and unbalanced. And when I'm going 100mph, I feel like I don't dare corner at all.

I rented an Eclipse the other day while on a business trip, and it can corner with more confidence than my car, although maybe a bit slower. Is it the nature of independent rear suspension, or is there something I can do that will make my inspire confidence?

The most expensive handling mod is the Griggs Racing stuff, but I have no idea if $=value in this case. Any suggestions?
yusuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2001, 03:58 PM   #2
thunderbolt
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 380
Post

I love old mustangs, but they are still 35 year old technology now. Kind of hard to compete with the new stuff. Here is my list of upgrades. Some of these are in my 72. Stiffen up the chasis. Chasis flex with defeat suspension. Subframe connectors are good. How about adding a stronger shock tower brace and maybe a monte carlo bar? Go with a preformance suspension package like a handeling package from Mustangs Plus or something like it. I have 620 front coils and it helped a bunch. Along with these parts rebuild the A arms and suspension components and use poly bushings. go with poly engine and trany mounts too. Front and rear sway bars and a slight lowering of the vehicle. This should improve handeling quite a bit.
I have the preformance suspension, 1inch front sway bar, rebuilt front suspension, poly bushings on almost all suspension components. Rear sway bar on the way. These made a vast difference in my car. But I just got a GMC 1500 with the trailering package and my new truck corners nearly as well as the car (it is truely good) New car proformance just kicks butt.
thunderbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2001, 05:13 PM   #3
Fostang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 599
Post

360 hp is a little too much without reinforcing the chassis. Mustangs plus has a chassis strenghting kit that sells for $360 but it's kind of difficult to add on if you've got the car put together. No need for sub frame connectors with this. How about some tubular A-arms, monte carlo bar, Koni shocks, front and rear sway bar, 5-leaf rear springs, lowering the car, wider tires, mounting battery in trunk, under rider traction bars, ummm I'm sure there are a few other ones that I can't remember at this time. These are just a ideas.

------------------
67'fastback-Edelbrock carb,intake,cam,valve springs.Rhode lifters, CompCam rocker arms, windage tray,cerama coated headers,dual flows with H-pipe, modded c-4,tci stall converter,perma cool electric fan,aluminum water pump,griffen aluminum radiator,accel 8.8 cable,wide cap distriburator,magnetic pick up,v-matic hurst shifter,edelbrock performer nitrous, carter electric fuel pump,ignitor coil,solid motor mounts,magna racing suspension,poly urathane bushings,under rider traction bars, comp. eng. s
Fostang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2001, 10:31 AM   #4
macx
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Gordonville MO USA
Posts: 448
Post

I got a deal on a 70 convert with hi miles.
Suspension all sagged out. Ended up with www.canadianmustang.com hi rate 1" lowered springs F&R, complete suspension
bushings & A-arm pivots & shocks. Lowered
the car 1", looks great. I got their
exclusive Midolyne bushings - firmer than
oem, don't go soft over time, but don't
transmit road shock like poly. Even w/o
other chassis stiffening mods (stock 302
yet) car handles totally better, rides
firm but w/o harsh road shock at every
line in the road. A MAJOR but often
overlooked part of the handling dept,
after stiffening the chassis, is the
steering. Those years had awful steering.
My power is all rebuilt, yet still sloppy.
I relate to your "disconnected" feeling
at speed.Total Control Products has both manual and power rack&pinion kits that are said to make VAST diff, but bring 2 heckbooks
esp for the power one. site maybe www.totalcontrolproducts.com or similar?
macx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2001, 08:31 AM   #5
Tom351
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 278
Post

These guys covered it, adding the rear sway bar makes a big difference, and a larger front bar along with some chassis braces will be a good start.

------------------
67 Fastback - Arctic White Pearl paint
351W ,Trick Flow Aluminum Heads, Edelbrock TorkerII, Carter 750 CFM, Comp. Cam 477/510 219/233@.050, Performance Automatic C-4 Trans, 3.55 gears, Front Disc Brakes, 1-1/8" Fr. 3/4" rear sway bars.

My 351W Fastback
Tom351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2001, 09:32 AM   #6
Jaydee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Conn.
Posts: 220
Post

Just curious - What engine combo are you running to make 360 hp at the rear wheels?. always interested to find out the mods done to make this kind of power.

------------------
1965 K code coupe - numbers matching - restoration ongoing. 1987 LX notch, 5 spd, stock heads (minor porting) and intake, 65mmTB, 3.55's, ram air, pulleys, shorty's, 2.5" exhaust with cats 13.89@100.25
Jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2001, 11:12 AM   #7
yusuf
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 56
Post

I have a 351W stroked to 427, a crate engine from Coast High Performance. It has a Weiand Stealth intake to fit under the stock hood; with a Victor Jr. intake, it might make more.

I have pretty much all the stuff you guys recommended for the suspension, and it does handle much better than when it was stock, but handling and traction are just not where they should be. Oh well, I guess that's the price for driving a cool classic.
yusuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2001, 03:25 PM   #8
Tom351
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 278
Post

A lot may be just road feel, An Eclipse going 100 feels different than a mustang going 100mph. I think the quicker steering ratio and sloped hood probably makes the Eclipse feel like it handles so much better when it may just be a little better.
Also, what do you have for brakes? When I had front drums, i was not too confident going into any cornering situation.
Tom351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2001, 03:51 PM   #9
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Post

Don't forget rims and tires. Wide rims and wide tires (good ones) are very important to handling. The right kind of tires too. You have to have the rims and tires to take advantage of the suspension mods.

Rev

------------------
'66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph
1/4 mi.
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handling help lito Corner Carvers Delight 11 07-09-2003 06:32 PM
Handling set-up polara7777 Corner Carvers Delight 3 05-13-2002 11:49 AM
gas millage and handling question Cataract2 Blue Oval Lounge 7 04-17-2002 10:02 PM
Best Handling Early Mustang? bigcarguy Classic Mustangs 6 12-29-2001 08:33 PM
Handling Black02GT Modular Madness 5 11-28-2001 02:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.


SEARCH