93 kb supercharged gt -what should i do x or h???

bad93gt · 03-01-2001, 09:31 PM

93 kb supercharged gt x or h??????.i have been trying to make up my mind for some time now and it is getting close to spring time.so i need to make it up soon.has anyone heard a supercharged stang(same car)with the x and then with the h.if so i would really like some input on this.or maybe on different charged stangs.what would be really cool is if someone has some wave files of both or either would be awesome.please help!

BowTie Eater 5 Liter · 03-01-2001, 09:58 PM

X-pipe has WAY MORE POWER, actually around 10hp

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!).
My Stang This Is What Dynomax Ultra-Flo's Do (Soon To Be On My Stang!)

Josh91 · 03-02-2001, 09:40 AM

I don't think the X makes much more power. I think it makes less torque, but more hp on the top end. I have heard one and the H sounds way better IMO. The X just sounds higher pitched and not nearly as mean.

------------------
1991 Mustang GT - Cobra Intake, FMS 65mm TB, C&L 73mm MAF, GT-40P heads, Crane 2031 cam, Crane 1.7rr, Built AOD, Art Carr 2400 non-lockup converter, Transgo shift kit, BBK chrome cold air, FMS 'P' headers, Pacesetter off-road H, BBK aluminum pulleys, 2-C Flows w/ dumps, 4.10's, Steeda STB, for now...

The Original GT-40P Tech Page

Green92LX · 03-02-2001, 10:14 AM

The X takes away from the sound...thats about it. Stick with the H. I haven't seen the X make incredible power differences either. Even if it is 5HP or so, I'd sacrifice it for the better sound.

stangsrule · 03-02-2001, 12:29 PM

I haven't heard a SC'd stang with an X pipe yet but I have heard a couple of NA ones and to me the X pipe take out all the rumble and smoothes it out. Too much for my taste. I wanted an X pipe till after I heard them and decided I like stangs with the H pipe and that distinctive mustang rumble... Well that's my .02...

------------------
92GT all the free stuff and a few bolt-ons, lowered with Ebiach's and Koni's, Kenny Brown subframe connectors, lower G-brace and jacking rails. BBK upper and lower control arms, polyurethane bushings all around and Ken Bell blower, ram-air, 80mm mass air, etc.

bad93gt · 03-02-2001, 06:36 PM

hey thanks

03-01-2001, 09:31 PM	#1
bad93gt Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: bamgor me.usa Posts: 19	93 kb supercharged gt -what should i do x or h??? 93 kb supercharged gt x or h??????.i have been trying to make up my mind for some time now and it is getting close to spring time.so i need to make it up soon.has anyone heard a supercharged stang(same car)with the x and then with the h.if so i would really like some input on this.or maybe on different charged stangs.what would be really cool is if someone has some wave files of both or either would be awesome.please help!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
95 GT & 00GT Didnt have a chance!	SprchrgdPony	Stang Stories	1	03-17-2002 11:28 PM
RESULTS - Grand Prix GT vs. Celica GTS	302 LX Eric	Stang Stories	7	09-25-2001 06:46 PM
ran a '01 GT	EZRIDN	Stang Stories	3	08-29-2001 08:17 PM
Whooped an '85 GT with my Wife's Volvo	NO SLO PK	Stang Stories	8	07-20-2001 12:46 PM
Moroso results w/ stock 207K '87 GT	EZRIDN	Stang Stories	3	07-12-2001 03:58 PM

03-01-2001, 09:58 PM	#2
BowTie Eater 5 Liter Registered Member Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World Posts: 871	X-pipe has WAY MORE POWER, actually around 10hp ------------------ 1988 Mustang GT, T-5 No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!). My Stang This Is What Dynomax Ultra-Flo's Do (Soon To Be On My Stang!)

03-02-2001, 09:40 AM	#3
Josh91 Registered Member Join Date: Nov 1998 Location: Salina, KS Posts: 83	I don't think the X makes much more power. I think it makes less torque, but more hp on the top end. I have heard one and the H sounds way better IMO. The X just sounds higher pitched and not nearly as mean. ------------------ 1991 Mustang GT - Cobra Intake, FMS 65mm TB, C&L 73mm MAF, GT-40P heads, Crane 2031 cam, Crane 1.7rr, Built AOD, Art Carr 2400 non-lockup converter, Transgo shift kit, BBK chrome cold air, FMS 'P' headers, Pacesetter off-road H, BBK aluminum pulleys, 2-C Flows w/ dumps, 4.10's, Steeda STB, for now... The Original GT-40P Tech Page

03-02-2001, 10:14 AM	#4
Green92LX Registered Member Join Date: Jun 1999 Location: North Haven,CT Posts: 336	The X takes away from the sound...thats about it. Stick with the H. I haven't seen the X make incredible power differences either. Even if it is 5HP or so, I'd sacrifice it for the better sound.

03-02-2001, 12:29 PM	#5
stangsrule Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Indiana Posts: 512	I haven't heard a SC'd stang with an X pipe yet but I have heard a couple of NA ones and to me the X pipe take out all the rumble and smoothes it out. Too much for my taste. I wanted an X pipe till after I heard them and decided I like stangs with the H pipe and that distinctive mustang rumble... Well that's my .02... ------------------ 92GT all the free stuff and a few bolt-ons, lowered with Ebiach's and Koni's, Kenny Brown subframe connectors, lower G-brace and jacking rails. BBK upper and lower control arms, polyurethane bushings all around and Ken Bell blower, ram-air, 80mm mass air, etc.

03-02-2001, 06:36 PM	#6
bad93gt Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: bamgor me.usa Posts: 19	hey thanks