Supercharging decisions.......

J_E_S_B69 · 09-25-2003, 12:35 PM

Would a smaller engine with a centrifugal blower tweaked to produce mid 500's Horsepower be better or worse than a bigger engine with a centrifugal blower not tweaked?

Considering price, front to rear weight ratio, and having to repair more often and such.

I have a 67' mustang coupe and want to have a pretty mean street machine, but I don't know which way I should go about it. Any help would be appreciated greatly. Thanks

whiteblue302 · 09-25-2003, 06:13 PM

Well I'm no expert on the matter, but it seems to me that trying to produce a whole lot of HP with a smaller engine is most likely going to wear it out a lot quick than a larger engine. I would imagine it would be cheaper to go with a larger engine, maybe a 351 or a 347 and have it supercharged, then to really have to soup up a smaller block. I think the rule of thumb for superchargers is roughly 10hp per 1 pound of boost. The added displacement from a larger engine would probably make up that horsepower easier than what it would take for the extra psi in a smaller one. Like I said, no expert, but that's what makes sense to me.
How small of a block were you figuring? 500hp wouldn't be too easy a number to make even from a 351 (running roughly 12psi, you would still need 380hp from the motor)

rwhite65 · 09-26-2003, 02:48 AM

the smaller engine is going to have to work harder to put out the same numbers as the larger displacement engine. But that is not to say that you could not get the 302 to push 500 horsepower with a supercharger of some kind....it has been done before.

But here is my question, why 500 horsepower. that is a crap load of power....and going to be a challenge gettting it all to the pavement. Is there a particular e.t time you want to be able to run, ir do you just want the engine that has an awesome dyno sheet?

With running an engine harder, you are going to have to make sure your cooling system is very good, need some great brakes to stop all that, and a good transmission and rearend to harness it all.

With a 67 you have the option of a big block. Don't get me wrong, I love building small blocks..which is all I have ever ran except for my truck (building it a 460). But if you are looking for power.....and a lot of it while not having to really build the engine......slap the big block in there, like a 460. Remember all that horsepower costs some money....but dollar for dollar, the big block is what you want if you want the big numbers and have the clearance unlike me.

Good luck with the engine that you pick...and keep me posted....would love to see what you build and how it works out for you.
Ryan

J_E_S_B69 · 09-26-2003, 12:36 PM

Honestly, this is my first car to ever own and hopefully the only car, so I might as well make it ****.....right?

Would a 460 fit inside the engine bay of a 67' Coupe?

And I will definetly keep you posted, thx for the info....

rwhite65 · 09-26-2003, 05:18 PM

well, I know there was 390's in the 67...and I know the 68's had 428's - I am sure it would be a tight fit.....but I am 98% sure the 460 will go in there.
Hopefully somebody in here can help me out....anyone in here done it before?
Ryan

09-25-2003, 12:35 PM	#1
J_E_S_B69 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ladonia, TX Posts: 13	Supercharging decisions....... Would a smaller engine with a centrifugal blower tweaked to produce mid 500's Horsepower be better or worse than a bigger engine with a centrifugal blower not tweaked? Considering price, front to rear weight ratio, and having to repair more often and such. I have a 67' mustang coupe and want to have a pretty mean street machine, but I don't know which way I should go about it. Any help would be appreciated greatly. Thanks

09-26-2003, 02:48 AM	#3
rwhite65 Ride Hard Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Wyoming IL Posts: 1,094	500 horsepower the smaller engine is going to have to work harder to put out the same numbers as the larger displacement engine. But that is not to say that you could not get the 302 to push 500 horsepower with a supercharger of some kind....it has been done before. But here is my question, why 500 horsepower. that is a crap load of power....and going to be a challenge gettting it all to the pavement. Is there a particular e.t time you want to be able to run, ir do you just want the engine that has an awesome dyno sheet? With running an engine harder, you are going to have to make sure your cooling system is very good, need some great brakes to stop all that, and a good transmission and rearend to harness it all. With a 67 you have the option of a big block. Don't get me wrong, I love building small blocks..which is all I have ever ran except for my truck (building it a 460). But if you are looking for power.....and a lot of it while not having to really build the engine......slap the big block in there, like a 460. Remember all that horsepower costs some money....but dollar for dollar, the big block is what you want if you want the big numbers and have the clearance unlike me. Good luck with the engine that you pick...and keep me posted....would love to see what you build and how it works out for you. Ryan __________________ 65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored

09-26-2003, 05:18 PM	#5
rwhite65 Ride Hard Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Wyoming IL Posts: 1,094	big block well, I know there was 390's in the 67...and I know the 68's had 428's - I am sure it would be a tight fit.....but I am 98% sure the 460 will go in there. Hopefully somebody in here can help me out....anyone in here done it before? Ryan __________________ 65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Supercharging an 85 V6 Mustang	Convert85	Small Ponies	0	03-08-2003 02:11 AM
good mods besides nitrus and supercharging	mak0341	Modular Madness	5	03-06-2003 09:52 AM
Decisions decisions	mean81GT	Windsor Power	0	03-01-2002 11:14 PM
Decisions decisions!	Five0	Blue Oval Lounge	8	10-21-2001 10:29 AM
Decisions, decisions!	fastang	Blue Oval Lounge	2	07-13-2001 02:26 AM

09-25-2003, 06:13 PM	#2
whiteblue302 Registered Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Santa Rosa, CA Posts: 6	Well I'm no expert on the matter, but it seems to me that trying to produce a whole lot of HP with a smaller engine is most likely going to wear it out a lot quick than a larger engine. I would imagine it would be cheaper to go with a larger engine, maybe a 351 or a 347 and have it supercharged, then to really have to soup up a smaller block. I think the rule of thumb for superchargers is roughly 10hp per 1 pound of boost. The added displacement from a larger engine would probably make up that horsepower easier than what it would take for the extra psi in a smaller one. Like I said, no expert, but that's what makes sense to me. How small of a block were you figuring? 500hp wouldn't be too easy a number to make even from a 351 (running roughly 12psi, you would still need 380hp from the motor)

09-26-2003, 12:36 PM	#4
J_E_S_B69 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Ladonia, TX Posts: 13	Honestly, this is my first car to ever own and hopefully the only car, so I might as well make it ****.....right? Would a 460 fit inside the engine bay of a 67' Coupe? And I will definetly keep you posted, thx for the info....