 
                    
                  
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|  | 
|  06-26-2003, 11:21 PM | #1 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Hamilton, NJ 
					Posts: 46
				 |  New Intake with NITROUS!!!???? I just received the Ford Racing Hi Flow Intake part number M-9424-E46  for my 1997 Mustang GT, I have been checking out all the parts and I am trying to figure out were I am going to put the Nitrous into the new intake anyone have this intake or used this intake with nitrous?????? Also does anyone know if I need new injectors with the intake???? 
				__________________ http://photos.yahoo.com/lascalcione Rice Haters Club Member # 99!!!!! HE WHO DIES WITH THE MOST TOYS WINS 1997 GT 12.41 @ 109 mph | 
|   |   | 
|  07-20-2003, 12:50 AM | #2 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: O'Fallon, MO 
					Posts: 32
				 |   I don't want to be mean.  But your avatar reminds me of the Fast and the Furious clowns, NOS button on the steering wheel.  Yet your sig says "Rice Hater."    
				__________________ ----------- Adam M. Bullard 1994 Ford Mustang GT   Too many mods since last E.T. http://www.geocities.com/adam94gt | 
|   |   | 
|  07-22-2003, 11:28 AM | #3 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: new jersey 
					Posts: 23
				 |   Put the  nozzle about a foot away from the throttle body, give or take a few inches,  that way the nitrous will optimize with the outside air and it will also cool down more of the intake charge going into the motor, good luck with the new intake. | 
|   |   | 
|  08-20-2003, 02:19 PM | #4 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA 
					Posts: 2,325
				 |   12.41 in a 97? Do tell... 
				__________________ 1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60' 1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.) 1964.5 Mustang 289 Rice Haters Club Member #13 | 
|   |   | 
|  08-20-2003, 02:48 PM | #5 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Hamilton, NJ 
					Posts: 46
				 |   12.41 was the E/T that I ran on Nitrous with the car mostly stock, I have a 150 shot. I just put a new intake on the car, I took it to the track over the past weekend just ran it on the motor improved my E/T from 14.8 to 14.3 at 94.79. Check out pictures of the car my website  http://photos.yahoo.com/lascalcione 
				__________________ http://photos.yahoo.com/lascalcione Rice Haters Club Member # 99!!!!! HE WHO DIES WITH THE MOST TOYS WINS 1997 GT 12.41 @ 109 mph | 
|   |   | 
|  09-08-2003, 01:54 AM | #6 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: ChiTown(So.Subs.) 
					Posts: 41
				 |  Hey ADAM, You should do something about your traction problems! With that MPH, you should be much fatser than a 14.3! | 
|   |   | 
|  09-08-2003, 05:21 AM | #7 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Hamilton, NJ 
					Posts: 46
				 |   I just changed my clutch, It was slipping. I have not taking it down to the track yet I will be taken it one day this week. It should do alot better. 
				__________________ http://photos.yahoo.com/lascalcione Rice Haters Club Member # 99!!!!! HE WHO DIES WITH THE MOST TOYS WINS 1997 GT 12.41 @ 109 mph | 
|   |   | 
|  09-08-2003, 10:34 AM | #8 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: new jersey 
					Posts: 23
				 |   "You should do something about your traction problems! With that MPH, you should be much fatser than a 14.3!" The MPH was 94.?? you think that is good for more then 14.3?????? So you tell me what do you think the E.T should be with a MPH of 95? The runs on nirtous were around 109MPH If you go faster than 14.3 be very proud of yourself, best of luck with it, If your happy with the car tahst all that matters http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/et_calculator.html | 
|   |   | 
|  09-08-2003, 05:46 PM | #9 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: ChiTown(So.Subs.) 
					Posts: 41
				 |  WTF???? Ummmm........ I was talking to Adam94GT. With a 101MPH trap speed, he should have lower than a 14.3 E.T.!!!!! I just happened to notice this in his sig. So dgrobels, I don't know WHAT you're refering to! | 
|   |   | 
|  09-09-2003, 07:05 AM | #10 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: new jersey 
					Posts: 23
				 |  Im tlaking abotu the person who started the thread 12.41 was the E/T that I ran on Nitrous with the car mostly stock, I have a 150 shot. I just put a new intake on the car, I took it to the track over the past weekend just ran it on the motor improved my E/T from 14.8 to 14.3 at 94.79. Check out pictures of the car my website  any yes with a 101 MPH he should be able to go 13.2`s if he can drive it | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| intake | ghostfacedriver | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 08-26-2003 07:16 AM | 
| Head and intake flow. Something to think about. :) | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-16-2003 08:52 AM | 
| Edelbrock spec's and intake question?? | jerryIII | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-24-2001 12:49 PM | 
| OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' | QUIN | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-09-2001 01:58 PM | 
| Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM | 
 
                    
                  