© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
12-04-2001, 11:13 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocala, FL, USA
Posts: 62
|
2003 Cobra 5.0 ?
Was reading about the 2003 Mustangs.
For all you guys who havnt read this posting. http://www.bonforums.com/mustang/mustang_02power.htm here is the picture (I DONT LIKE IT!! )
__________________
**Officially not stock anymore!!* 1990 Mustang GT Convertible, Blue with Grey ground effects and white top. Black Leather interior pw,pl,ps,pm, premium sound system and flowmaster mufflers. |
12-05-2001, 01:12 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
|
thats the ugliest mustang yet. why not go out & just buy a ******* honda? i can say that the old 64.5-68 mustangs are the best (imo).
whats next? front wheel drive? (no offense to any of you who this new look)
__________________
1984 Bronco II, 36" Michelin Military Tires, 95 EFI 5.0, NP435 Tranny, NP208 Doubler, NP205 Transfer Case, Fill Size Solid Dana 44 Front End, WH Progressive Rate Rock Crawling Coils, Bronco 8.8 Rear, Skyjacker Softride Leafs, 5.13 Gears, Detroit Locker. Final Crawl Ratio Of 175:1 88 GT Best 60ft. 2.181 Best ET 14.350 Best MPH 98.01 ~WRECKED!!!!~ |
12-05-2001, 01:12 AM | #3 |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
Ok first of all the Mustang isn't gonna be redesigned until 2004. Secondly that isNOT a picture of the new generation Mustang. Third I don't think Ford will go will all the different engine options. More than likley the base model will only have one engine avalible(although I may not be the 3.8), same with the GT(although I might have more power than the 99-current year models. The Cobra is the only car likley to get a bump in displacment, you can for get about it in the GT.
__________________
1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide |
12-05-2001, 01:21 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
|
thank god thats not what the new mustang will be. i dont like the idea of a 4v 5.0, instead i think they should use the 2000 Cobra R 5.4L motors in all the cobras, or even better, ford lightning motors. then stock fords could start competing with faster cars (hopefully one day, maby even vipers!!!)
__________________
1984 Bronco II, 36" Michelin Military Tires, 95 EFI 5.0, NP435 Tranny, NP208 Doubler, NP205 Transfer Case, Fill Size Solid Dana 44 Front End, WH Progressive Rate Rock Crawling Coils, Bronco 8.8 Rear, Skyjacker Softride Leafs, 5.13 Gears, Detroit Locker. Final Crawl Ratio Of 175:1 88 GT Best 60ft. 2.181 Best ET 14.350 Best MPH 98.01 ~WRECKED!!!!~ |
12-05-2001, 02:08 AM | #5 |
He said Member...heh, heh
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Jupiter, Florida U.S.A.
Posts: 3,718
|
ugh... that looks nasty!
__________________
Joe! 1988 GT, 13.58@101mph Check out my listing! Click here! Or my website:www.joe4speed.com |
12-05-2001, 03:15 AM | #6 |
The Photoshop Guru
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mecca, Indiana
Posts: 1,419
|
It's not bad, but that front end needs some SERIOUS work!!! That's waht makes that car so ugly.
__________________
Project: 1988 Coupe - EFI 5.8L Twin Turbo with Victor intake, Canfield heads, F303 cam, March aluminum underdrive pulleys, TKO (or T56 if funds permit), PBR twin piston calipers and 13" rotors up front, 94 Cobra rear calipers and 12" rotors on the rear, 3.73's, Griggs K-member, tubular front control arms, torque arm and panhard bar, polished 99 Cobra wheels. "The GR-40 kit installation is now complete, and the humble Fox-chassis car will now out-corner and out-stop a ZR-1 or a Viper, and support massive horsepower additions with perfect balance." Griggs Racing ICQ# 42269241 |
12-05-2001, 04:04 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Daly City CA USA baby
Posts: 42
|
i think batman might like it, then again he's probably better off in the batmobile. damn thats an ugly car. phew
|
12-05-2001, 05:12 AM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: orlando,fl USA
Posts: 44
|
I wouldn't hold my breath on that!
I don't think that the brass @ Ford really care.I mean look what they gave us to replace the 5.0 with!I think we as a group need to stop beating around the bush,and just say it! The mod motor is
a boat anchor!(Random House;Anchor1.Heavy device for keeping boats inplace2.A gasoline powered engine product of The Ford Motor Company)The bore spacing,right out of the box,doesn't allow for any bore size larger then that of a Briggs,The stroke is (compared to bore size)like a diesel peice of equipment. The think(4V)is wider then a 460!I mean what were they thinking?(or what kind of $#@! drugs were they doing?)I'm very disapointed. I can't under stand why they never used the 351 as an option?(and I don't mean one off cars that reg. guys will not be able to get)They let the Mustang slide off as GM was coming on strong with the LT1,and then,oh ya,The LS1!What was there answer,Well here you go!281 cubes of "small bore,Diesel stroke wonder"I know that they came back in 99',but really,just how much can we expect from 281?And I don't think we should spend 24,000-30,000 and the have to buy a blower to keep up with brand Xs stock ride!The reason that the "After Market "hasn't made any parts for the mod motor is there is no potential! They come from the factory "super tuned"there is no more power to be had in N/A form.I look at a blower/turbo as the last resort on any thing,it almost like cheating!
__________________
89'LX 5.oh.BBK shortys,no cats Flow masters w/Dumps,Crane Cam(Top secert) MSD 6AL,Blaster coil,Motor sport 9mm wires,under drive pulleys,no smog timming @ 16 deg,K&N,70 mm maf, Pro5.0shifter,Home made frame con. south side lift bars,3.73 bald @#! tires(2 on rear!)Sony C-D and Rockford fasgate rear,w/sony explode 5 1/2 in front. |
12-05-2001, 07:59 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Springfield, Ma, usa
Posts: 706
|
i really like the doors, but that front end needs to be changed a little bit!
__________________
NewEngland Auto www.baystategearheads.com -91 Mustang Coupe, ex 4cyl (sold) -99 F150, 3" lift, 35" Procomps, Magnaflow exhaust |
12-05-2001, 09:17 AM | #10 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
Brad
__________________
1990 GT, 347, TFS TW Heads, TFS Cam, TFS Track heat, Twin turbos, FMIC, T5. Built Ford Tough Moderator |
|
12-05-2001, 10:46 AM | #11 | |
Being stroked is great
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 772
|
Re: I wouldn't hold my breath on that!
Quote:
Hmmm...dude you seem seriously misinformed, and you obviously haven't driven a new Stang with a mod motor. Way smoother, better mileage, high RPM potential...they are the motor of the future. Ford didn't answer that well to the LS1 power-wise, but at least the new Cobra's will be running close to them in stock form. And if you think there's no potential from a 4.6 4V, maybe stop in the Modular Forum and read up a bit. Stock GT's run low 12's with JUST a blower. No 5.0 could hope to do that. They are also faster out of the box now than any 5.0 was (260 horsies). Give the aftermarket time - the reason there aren't that many parts out there yet is because it's a NEW MOTOR still. OK I'm done. |
|
12-05-2001, 12:24 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
|
That is not a new mustang from Ford.
The 03 is supposed to be the new body style, although it is setback to 04 now. That is just one more gaudy body kit. It actually reminds me of when a company like Winnebago comes out with the new "aero" line of trailers. The Terminator is real. The last I saw, it was on the dyno for emissions work. |
12-05-2001, 01:04 PM | #13 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
guys, take a look at the front end again
doesnt it look like someone doctored up a photo with photoshop? look at the shading and blurryness on the front bumper i could be wrong though
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
12-05-2001, 02:34 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocala, FL, USA
Posts: 62
|
Im a retard I didnt think before posting the pic I didnt notice that it is at a dealership. I dont believe ford is even releasing the photo's yet, why would a dealership have the car ? Sorry about that guys.
BTW I thought the 2003 was suppose to look more like the Fox 3 ? Thanks, Abe
__________________
**Officially not stock anymore!!* 1990 Mustang GT Convertible, Blue with Grey ground effects and white top. Black Leather interior pw,pl,ps,pm, premium sound system and flowmaster mufflers. |
12-05-2001, 06:00 PM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 214
|
Fake Fake Fake !
I'm willing to bet $100 that its fake, you can see that there are no lines from the bumper to fender, where the convert roof hooks to the top of the window frame, the rear spoiler, near the bottom corner of the doors, etc, etc, etc..
BUT, those doors look nice, and having no lines makes it look like a 1 piece body.. sorta cool.. BUT, the blueovalnews stuff is accurate.. AND, the 4.6 is great, but will never have the aftermarket of the 5.0, ever.. I've read on blueovalnews that Ford is pitching the Focus more than the Mustang to tuners, so...... It'll be the 5.0 people that keep the tuners financially alive and able to tune for the 4.6... Either way, they are both great motors.. |
12-05-2001, 07:04 PM | #16 |
Long time member in and out
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Albany, Ga
Posts: 343
|
Interesting!!!!! Someone is playing a sick joke here and I don't like it all!!The picture is obviously a fake!!!!!!!!!!!Someone is not going to Mustang Heaven now. Sorry for whoever that may be.
James
__________________
90' Mustang GT Convertible- C4 w/ manual body 4.10's soon to be 3.27's 2 Ch Flowmasters 1/8th ET 9.04 |
12-08-2001, 06:23 AM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
Quote:
Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
|
12-08-2001, 12:22 PM | #18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Well...
I don't believe Ford would release anything nearly as ugly as that. Nor do I believe the car will have any more than 3 engine options across the entire Mustang lineup. As for the 5.0 vs 4.6 and 5.8 vs the 4.6 vs the 5.4, this is pretty old. The 5.0 blows itself apart at about 500hp. No more than 350-375hp is possible from a N/A 5.0 that is streetable. The most powerful 5.0 GT made 225hp/300tq. It was tuned for just that, and requires an intake and heads to significantly bump power, and a better cam to get to the 350hp land. The 4.6 SOHC has a very strong block, but I do not know it's potential power holding. There is little aftermarket for the 4.6L, but with forced induction the 4.6 can easily match the 5.0. 300+hp is obtainable with Ford factory parts. The 99GT's heads/cams/intake package on a 96-98 will do that, or probably the 96-98's pistons into a 99GT. The 4.6 is, as mentioned, much smoother and better suited to making higher power levels at higher rpms. It does NOT get better fuel economy than the 5.0. The 4.6 DOHC has a very strong block as well. Too bad the rods are so damn weak. It has about the same power holding ability as the 5.0 due to that dumbass oversight. It makes over 300hp in stock form, thus blowing ANY production 302 well out of the water, blowing ANY production 351 out of the water, and doing it readily. With boost or mods, the 5.0 and 5.8 will NEVER see the kind of power this engine can make in a streetable combo. There are a few aftermarket N/A products for it as well. It can easily eclipse 400hp N/A. In fact, this engine can more than likely match the 5.8 stride for stride in ANY capabilities other than the stroker segment. The 5.8 is a gas hogging weak *** stock engine with a lot of potential. I wouldn't want one if you paid me to take it. Sure, you can build it to make very high power levels, but man, what a turd in stock form. The 302 will match it stride for stride, and not give you 10-15mpg. The aftermarket for EFI 351's is not as specifically catered to that engine as the 5.0, with most products seemingly being 5.0 parts with a twist. The 5.4 SOHC is great with boost. Other than the fact Ford had a lot of problems with the early engines lunching crankshafts. A very strong block and decent stock power levels with quite a bit of potential. It has yet to be wedged into a Mustang, and will NEVER be wedged in with the lightnings blower. The 5.4 DOHC is a monster. Pure and simple. The Cobra R's engine is making 380rwhp, not 385 at the crank. The Navagator's DOHC makes a mockery of ANY stock 351 placed into a car. More torque, more hp, collosal powerband. Comparing this engine to the 5.8 is a joke. The only way you're going to compete with this engines potential is to stroke a siamese bore 351 way the hell out. |
12-10-2001, 02:04 AM | #19 |
Yay for Chickys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,532
|
errr what HE said
Either way, BON obviously caught on, because that box with a big red X doesn't look too much like a Mustang to me |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you think SVT will strike gold with the new supercharged, 390HP 2003 Mustang Cobra | StangFlyer | Blue Oval Lounge | 86 | 04-08-2004 03:33 PM |
What do you think the price of the 2003 SVT Cobra should be? | StangFlyer | Blue Oval Lounge | 28 | 04-06-2003 02:31 PM |
2003 Cobra Buyer Beware!! | Doug McGinn | Modular Madness | 16 | 07-25-2002 08:26 AM |
2003 SVT Cobra. | Vision | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 02-19-2002 03:38 PM |
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |