MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums

MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums (http://forums.mustangworks.com/index.php)
-   Windsor Power (http://forums.mustangworks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   3"pro-chamber or 3" x-pipe (http://forums.mustangworks.com/showthread.php?t=4196)

Five0 07-02-2001 10:59 PM

3"pro-chamber or 3" x-pipe
 
I have long tube headers and I am going to run 3" x-pipe or 3" prochamber but I want everyone’s opinion on which one to get.
I will be running 1 chamber 3" flowmasters and 3" turndowns. The motor will be a 347 stroker.
How do you think this will sound?

I was thinking the x-pipe would tone it down a little and I have heard the pro chamber does not sound good but I have never heard one.


------------------
James Cox
nochevy@hotmail.com
1991 Mustang LX
12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft

93CobraR 07-02-2001 11:42 PM

I think that I would probably go with a H-pipe. They are cheaper and I think they sound bettter. But if it's between those two, I would get the ProChamber, just becuase of the different sound it makes.

------------------
87 GT, Cobra R's,GT-40 heads,Crane 2031,1.7's, Edelbrock intake, long tubes,BBK cold air, Mass air,pulleys,Pro 5.0, King Cobra,Lakewood Lift Bars,50/50's,subframes, 4.10's.
Best time 12.759
Best MPH 106.79
Best 60' 1.695

Visit my site at:
http://www.geocities.com/cobrar93_2000/MyPage.html


Five0 07-03-2001 08:12 PM

Thanks CobraR.

Anyone else?

------------------
James Cox
nochevy@hotmail.com
1991 Mustang LX
12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft

jimberg 07-03-2001 08:23 PM

I think a 3" exhaust is a bit overkill for a 347. It will really sap your low-end.

I'd go with the 2 1/2" x-pipe (Hedman Headers brand). H-pipes are only good to 3k. The Hedmen made more power than pro chamber in a 5.0 Mustang and Super Ford test.

------------------
351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.