302 HO Camshaft

Black Cat · 03-19-2002, 01:28 PM

I just came upon this board after purchasing a 82' Mercury Capri. I have a question for all you Ford heads. This car came with a 302 H.O. 2 Barrel. My question is that it was rebuilt by a shop about 35,000 miles ago, and it appears that they installed the forged pistions, however it has a, we'll call it "std 302" cam vs. the H.O. Cam. Should I change this out, and what gains would I see. Thankss for any help on this.

Mr 5 0 · 03-19-2002, 02:14 PM

Without the 'HO' cam, you don't have an HO motor. Although the HO cam runs a tad short on upper-RPM power, it's still miles above the 'stock' cam.

The H.O. cam has a .444 lift vs .379 /.375 for the 'base' 5.0.
Duration is .266/.276 for the H.O. vs .244/.256 for the base 5.0. It makes a difference.

I can't tell you what the exact performance differences would be but it should be noticable, especially if you intend to make performance modifications to the Merc.

PKRWUD · 03-21-2002, 07:45 PM

Also, the H.O. cam should be steel (as opposed to cast iron), and may require a different distributor gear, as well as a different firing order.

Take care,
-Chris

Unit 5302 · 03-22-2002, 08:47 PM

Personally I wonder if it's a 1982 HO that is being talked about, or a roller HO. What hasn't been mentioned here is that the roller HO cam will require roller valvetrain, and if I'm not mistaken, the camshaft itself won't work with your block. (Roller conversions are made for a different camshaft diameter, aren't they?)

The 1982HO cam is as follows:

.416/.445 198*/208*@.500 and 260*/274* overall.

I think the standard cam back then was the same as the 255

.380/.380 244*/244* overall.

The 1979 5.0's used

.381/.397 244*/256* overall

Violent84 · 03-23-2002, 12:11 AM

As far as I'm aware my 84 had the same flat tappet cam. It was called the 2V marine cam. Personally I think it was pretty wimpy. It fell on its face at about 4500. Swap it out for a 268 xtreme energy grind. I talked witha few guys and they said that it would operate well even with the stock heads and it's the largest xtreme energy grind you can run using the matching springs without spring pocket mods. Get rid of the junky 2 barrel and get some headers and exhaust and you'll prolly be a pretty happy camper. Oh yeah, 3.73's wouldn't be a bad idea either.

later

03-19-2002, 01:28 PM	#1
Black Cat Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Marysville, WA Posts: 1	302 HO Camshaft I just came upon this board after purchasing a 82' Mercury Capri. I have a question for all you Ford heads. This car came with a 302 H.O. 2 Barrel. My question is that it was rebuilt by a shop about 35,000 miles ago, and it appears that they installed the forged pistions, however it has a, we'll call it "std 302" cam vs. the H.O. Cam. Should I change this out, and what gains would I see. Thankss for any help on this.

03-19-2002, 02:14 PM	#2
Mr 5 0 Conservative Individualist Join Date: May 1997 Location: Wherever I need to be Posts: 7,487	H.O. cam differences Without the 'HO' cam, you don't have an HO motor. Although the HO cam runs a tad short on upper-RPM power, it's still miles above the 'stock' cam. The H.O. cam has a .444 lift vs .379 /.375 for the 'base' 5.0. Duration is .266/.276 for the H.O. vs .244/.256 for the base 5.0. It makes a difference. I can't tell you what the exact performance differences would be but it should be noticable, especially if you intend to make performance modifications to the Merc.

03-21-2002, 07:45 PM	#3
PKRWUD Junior Member Join Date: Mar 1999 Location: Ventura, California Posts: 8,981	Also, the H.O. cam should be steel (as opposed to cast iron), and may require a different distributor gear, as well as a different firing order. Take care, -Chris __________________ Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local RED & WHITE!

03-23-2002, 12:11 AM	#5
Violent84 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Shenandoah, Va Posts: 34	As far as I'm aware my 84 had the same flat tappet cam. It was called the 2V marine cam. Personally I think it was pretty wimpy. It fell on its face at about 4500. Swap it out for a 268 xtreme energy grind. I talked witha few guys and they said that it would operate well even with the stock heads and it's the largest xtreme energy grind you can run using the matching springs without spring pocket mods. Get rid of the junky 2 barrel and get some headers and exhaust and you'll prolly be a pretty happy camper. Oh yeah, 3.73's wouldn't be a bad idea either. later __________________ 84 GT-350, 2.5" Ram air hood, Centerline Pintails, 5-lug conversion, Recaro's, 140 speedo, 8.8 conversion, 3.73's, Motorsport A/C eliminator, Hurst shifter, ASP pulleys, Eibach pro kit, KYB's, Flowmaster exhaust, Long tubes, Flowtech off road h-pipe, .030 overbore, Extreme Energy 268, AFR 185's, CC Hi Tech Pushrods, CC Pro Magnum RR's, Pete Jackson Gear drive, 750 Speed Demon,Aeromotive 1000 hp pump, Aeromotive FPR, Aeromotive fuel filters,Weiand Xcelerator intake, Max Motorsports aluminum rack bushings, 3-core radiator,SSM Lift bars, Metco adj uppers, Motorsport aluminum driveshaft, MSD Ignition and coil, and more to come!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Specs on my Camshaft	Kisner	Classic Mustangs	2	08-01-2004 12:55 PM
ported gt40's and stock camshaft	chiaronate	Windsor Power	11	04-14-2004 05:15 PM
Camshaft Question	SmokinStangGT	Windsor Power	7	10-20-2003 12:40 AM
camshaft gains w/new stuff	84LX89GT	Windsor Power	5	06-30-2003 09:18 AM
camshaft selection	chiaronate	Windsor Power	2	06-09-2003 02:17 AM

03-22-2002, 08:47 PM	#4
Unit 5302 Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 5,246	Personally I wonder if it's a 1982 HO that is being talked about, or a roller HO. What hasn't been mentioned here is that the roller HO cam will require roller valvetrain, and if I'm not mistaken, the camshaft itself won't work with your block. (Roller conversions are made for a different camshaft diameter, aren't they?) The 1982HO cam is as follows: .416/.445 198/208@.500 and 260/274 overall. I think the standard cam back then was the same as the 255 .380/.380 244/244 overall. The 1979 5.0's used .381/.397 244/256 overall