MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-17-2002, 12:25 AM   #1
jruppert
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Reed City Mi
Posts: 106
Question 331 stroker crank material?

Can anyone tell me what is the difference between the strength of the forged crank and the nodular crank or even the cast steel cranks? I am planning on building a 331 stroker for my '94 GT and have been seeing some nodular cranks offered in the kits. Thanks
jruppert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2002, 07:06 AM   #2
302 LX Eric
or '331 LX Eric'
 
302 LX Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Default

Forged steel is the strongest and cast steel crank will do the job up to around 600 HP.

If you're going to keep the motor N/A, a cast crank should be plenty. I went with a 4340 forged steel crank on my 331 because I will be adding a supercharger and wanted peace of mind.

E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles

331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials

12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60'
302 LX Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2002, 02:26 PM   #3
jruppert
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Reed City Mi
Posts: 106
Default

Hey thanks for the info. Originally I wanted to do a 347 but the more I read on it, I hear a lot of people say how its harder on the cylinder walls. I want an engine that is gonna be reliable.
jruppert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2002, 04:15 PM   #4
302 LX Eric
or '331 LX Eric'
 
302 LX Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Default

No problem, glad I could help.

I too was looking into the 347, but with the better rod ratio of the 331 and less stress on the cylinder walls, I went with the 331. Also, a 347 requires even more notching of the cylinders than does a 331. The older 347 kits had oil control issues - the wrist pin was up into the oil control ring, however, they've seemed to solve this problem by using a different rod length and placement in the piston.

Both are good strokers, I just like the 331 a little better.

Good luck with your stroker build-up and if you have any questions, feel free to ask.

E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles

331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials

12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60'
302 LX Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2002, 09:28 PM   #5
Oldschoolpony
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Gainsville,Fl
Posts: 229
Arrow 347

Ive been punding on my 347 for quit some time. No problems here. Although, if its your only means of transportation, Id go 331 too. But Coast has a 347 kit designed to go 100,000 miles. Sounds like a daily driver to me. As for the crank, If you're using a stock 5.0 block, cast steel is the way to go. Scat claims their crank will hold 650 HP. And coast says with their girdle the block will do the same. why install a 1000 HP capable crank in a block that will rip apart at 700 hp?

I shift my 347 at 7400 rpm, in first to second, no problem.(456 gears) Only problem I have is I went through 2 W.C T-5s in 16 runs The hanlon one lasted through only 6 runs.
Oldschoolpony is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blown Stroker Computer Help RabidPony Modular Madness 10 02-07-2004 11:56 PM
'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker mike5p01 Windsor Power 4 10-11-2003 10:11 PM
Decided to build a stroker, but where do I start? WhiteLX Windsor Power 5 12-16-2002 10:35 AM
650HP stock block ultraflo Windsor Power 73 11-07-2002 11:35 AM
Crank key help "half moon key" quick89gt Windsor Power 2 05-05-2002 05:26 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.


SEARCH