MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

tmoss · 12-07-2006, 11:24 PM

I thought I'd post up another case - of course we know that these dynos were way out of cal and that this is really all BS.

unit5302 - Saying it can't be done and it's BS is an incredibly arrogant statement to make - just because you don't THINK it can be done does not mean it is not being done.

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=815064

12-07-2006, 11:24 PM	#39
tmoss Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Saint Louis, MO Posts: 634	Re: Is 350 RWHP Possible ? I thought I'd post up another case - of course we know that these dynos were way out of cal and that this is really all BS. unit5302 - Saying it can't be done and it's BS is an incredibly arrogant statement to make - just because you don't THINK it can be done does not mean it is not being done. http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=815064 __________________ Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/