MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

Mach 1 · 12-20-2001, 02:06 PM

You can run a edelbrock 351 lower with a performer rpm upper if your worried about low end torque.

I do like the clean look of the downs box as compared to a large plenum sitting there.

tough call, perfromance would probably be similar, but if your looking for street manners, I would go with the edelbrock lower with the 5.0 performer rpm upper.

12-20-2001, 02:06 PM	#10
Mach 1 Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Georgia Posts: 3,866	You can run a edelbrock 351 lower with a performer rpm upper if your worried about low end torque. I do like the clean look of the downs box as compared to a large plenum sitting there. tough call, perfromance would probably be similar, but if your looking for street manners, I would go with the edelbrock lower with the 5.0 performer rpm upper. __________________ 2002 GT 1993 GT (SOLD) '93 Mustang GT RHC member #142 Last edited by Mach 1; 12-20-2001 at 02:12 PM..