MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-2001, 09:55 PM   #1
BowTie Eater 5 Liter
Registered Member
 
BowTie Eater 5 Liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
Post 408 all motor or Twin turbo 302?

Need some thoughts?
incon twin turbo on stock 302 or a 408 fuel injected, roller cam, trick flow T/W, trick flow 351 intake?

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!).
My Stang
BowTie Eater 5 Liter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2001, 10:49 PM   #2
jonnyk
Being stroked is great
 
jonnyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 772
Post

The Incons will probably be a heckuva lot cheaper, and they have awesome streetability. A 408 conversion could turn into a PIA, and can get expensive in a big hurry. I'll probably take the Incon route myself once the funds allow.

------------------
1991 LX Hatch 5.0L
jonnyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2001, 10:52 PM   #3
brooksgnm
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Union, Ohio, USA
Posts: 582
Lightbulb

I'd agree first go with the incon twin turbo. Then when you have funds build a twin turbo 408!! Heh!!

------------------
85 GT many mods drag car
84 SVO auto x type car
brooksgnm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2001, 11:18 PM   #4
BlackFly
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: winnipeg , manitoba , canada
Posts: 83
Post

I to must agree, the incon is probably your best bet. Your car will run normal when driven so, and like a raped ape when you rug it. Plus, any mods you make to the 302 after, like heads or intake, will only compound your fun. The typical mods only make even more power when hooked to a turbo, can you say holy $**t, hang on.
BlackFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2001, 12:34 AM   #5
84_GT350
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 1,631
Post

Chalk up another Incon vote. Sure, they may be a bit more involved to install, but they'll be cheaper (probably) and make as much or more power with a well matched kit.

------------------
1984 1/2 GT350 (#842 Hatchback w/ T-tops), 302HO, Comp cams Xtreme Energy cam, Carter 625cfm carb, Weiand Stealth intake, MSD distributor, MSD coil, FMS 9mm wires, 1 5/8" MAC unequal shorties, 2 1/2" MAC Prochamber H-pipe, Flowmaster 2 chambers, KYBs, 16"x8" 4 lug Cobra Rs, Falken 245/45ZR16s
84_GT350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2001, 05:13 PM   #6
NO SLO PK
Registered Member
 
NO SLO PK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
Post

I guess I'm the minority here. After using forced induction for over 100k miles I can say that it's generally a pain in the a** on reliability and tuning. In addition, turbos are more complex than blowers because of the tremendous amount of underhood heat that needs to be dealt with. Besides, you won't be stressing a windsor block at 500+ hp, but that is a threshold for the 302 block. I guess it depends on what you are looking for.

------------------
'91 LX
Procharger, 3 row intercooler, extrude honed Cobra intake, Mac full Length Headers, 30# inj., 73mm C&L, 75mm tb, E303 cam, 289 rods, ported E7 heads, MSD, T-Rex w/255 lph Walbro, 5 lug conversion, Cobra R wheels, 3.27 gears and Moser Axles.

[This message has been edited by NO SLO PK (edited 02-24-2001).]
NO SLO PK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2001, 10:36 PM   #7
BowTie Eater 5 Liter
Registered Member
 
BowTie Eater 5 Liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
Post

Thanks Yall, but Im going to build a 351w

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!).
My Stang
BowTie Eater 5 Liter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2001, 02:19 PM   #8
LOWKEY
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: greenvile, NC
Posts: 161
Post

I think I going to agree too. Forced induction is great and all but its just not the same. My next motor is going to be a 8k rpm solid roller 408....shooting for 500hp at the wheels..

------------------
89'notch

331ci Scat Stroker, Stage II Holley heads, ported Holley Systemax Intake, 70mm Holley TB, 50lb Holley Fuel Injectors, 80mm Pro-m MAF, AFM B-3 cam, Vortech S-trim Supercharger, AFM Powerpipe, EEC-Tuner, TKO, Koni, Eibach, HPM, etc...

Beaten Daily..

http://lowkey.stangnet.com
LOWKEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbo vs SC Sounds like good advice mustardjohn Small Ponies 0 11-16-2003 05:21 PM
Ran a turbo Integra, a Grand National, and two bikes!!! WhiteT78Supra Stang Stories 23 07-19-2002 07:21 AM
Turbo in n/a 2.3? pxcr_600 Small Ponies 1 06-21-2002 12:20 PM
What's needed to build a Turbo 5.0L? Gautam Windsor Power 1 06-07-2001 05:34 PM
How do I know if the turbo is working? Trevor Small Ponies 3 07-20-1999 10:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.


SEARCH