MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-02-2003, 12:49 AM   #1
nasty sn95
Registered Member
 
nasty sn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: joliet
Posts: 6
Default 5.0 into a 96 GT

how hard would it be to put a 5 litter into a 96 GT
nasty sn95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 02:02 AM   #2
underpsi
Registered Member
 
underpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: brigham ut, near salt
Posts: 4
Default

put a 94-95 k member in it
__________________

check out the new forums!
underpsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 01:13 PM   #3
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Not very hard at all. I say go for it if you are going to stay naturally aspirated. 5.0's are cheaper and easier to modify thatn the 4.6.

You would need the 5.0 computer and harness.

cross memeber

motor mounts

and maybe a tranny mount.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 01:16 PM   #4
fiveohpatrol
I'd rather be basketweaving
 
fiveohpatrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
Default

In the end, I think you would be much happier by just doing the 99-up PI head/intake swap. You'll make alot more power than a stockish 5.0L motor, and tons more than your current engine.

The 4.6's aftermarket is starting to really come alive, so theres plenty of parts to choose from now. Not to mention the fact that that motor really loves boost

But if you just insist on putting a pushrod motor into it, and want to go through all the trouble, then why not a 351? Not really anymore work than putting a 302 in it.

Just a thought, good luck

-drew
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516
NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft
fiveohpatrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 01:19 PM   #5
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fiveohpatrol


But if you just insist on putting a pushrod motor into it, and want to go through all the trouble, then why not a 351? Not really anymore work than putting a 302 in it.

Just a thought, good luck

-drew
That is a good point. A 351 would be a hell of an upgrade.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 05:12 PM   #6
nasty sn95
Registered Member
 
nasty sn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: joliet
Posts: 6
Default

true very true but the mod motor is very coastly it coast so much to build thats why i want a small block ford but if it coast to much im just going to buy a fox body so let me know if any one has a good fox roller or not thanks
nasty sn95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 10:58 PM   #7
tireburner163
It's a lot like a race car
 
tireburner163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fiveohpatrol
In the end, I think you would be much happier by just doing the 99-up PI head/intake swap. You'll make alot more power than a stockish 5.0L motor, and tons more than your current engine.

The 4.6's aftermarket is starting to really come alive, so theres plenty of parts to choose from now. Not to mention the fact that that motor really loves boost

But if you just insist on putting a pushrod motor into it, and want to go through all the trouble, then why not a 351? Not really anymore work than putting a 302 in it.

Just a thought, good luck

-drew
You can have a 99+ head swap OR boost. You can't have both. Well you can.....but only if you have some serious balls. The 99+ headswap results in 11:1 compression on a 96-98 4.6. You gonna throw boost on top of that?
__________________
1987 Buick T-type

1998 HD Electra Elide
tireburner163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 11:09 PM   #8
fiveohpatrol
I'd rather be basketweaving
 
fiveohpatrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
Default

Quote:
The 99+ headswap results in 11:1 compression on a 96-98 4.6
thats one slight detail that I completely forgot about

I thought it was more like 10-10.5:1, but either way, thats too much for any decent amount of boost.
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516
NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft
fiveohpatrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raced a 99 GT 5-speed StoplightWarrior Stang Stories 4 05-15-2002 09:13 PM
1988 Gt - 1998 Gt Hp Each Year steedamustang01 Modular Madness 13 05-09-2002 07:26 PM
1996 Cobra vs 2000 Mustang GT Milktasd Stang Stories 2 04-05-2002 03:11 AM
RESULTS - Grand Prix GT vs. Celica GTS 302 LX Eric Stang Stories 7 09-25-2001 06:46 PM
Just got my '89 GT! Time slip guesses? 84stangLX Blue Oval Lounge 6 07-25-2001 09:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.


SEARCH