

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ORANGE PARK FL. USA
Posts: 208
|
![]() I HAVE A GT 40 INTAKE WITH PORTED LOWER. I WAS WONDERING IF A PERFORMER RPM WOULD BE A BETTER INTAKE. I HAVE HEARD THAT THE PERFORMER RPM FLOWS BETTER THAN A STOCK GT 40 BUT MY GT 40 IS PORTED. IM THINKING THAT I SHOULD JUST STAY WITH THE GT 40.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
edelbrock performer rpm heads | hippi97 | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-01-2001 08:40 PM |
Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |
Performer RPM vs. Track Heat which is better for my setup? | MY91GT | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-19-2001 12:52 PM |
Performer RPM or Stealth | Dangerous Dave | Windsor Power | 1 | 01-11-2001 11:45 PM |