© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
07-04-2001, 12:48 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4
|
Calling all AFR 165cc owners
I'm getting a set next week, which roller rocker and pushrods should I get?
Also whats the differance bettween ped and stud mount rockers? Thanks!!!! |
07-04-2001, 01:51 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Valparaiso, IN USA
Posts: 56
|
Call the guys at AFR and talk to them. They're great they'll give you all kinds of info. I'm planning on buying a 185 set shortly. They explained to me that you have greater flexibility with stud mount rockers because you can compensate easier if you have minor variations in push rod length.
|
07-04-2001, 08:59 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 53
|
I have AFR 165cc's. Get the stud mounted style heads. Gives you more flexibility to run a bigger camshaft. My pushrods are Manley heavy duty with the stock length.
|
07-04-2001, 12:22 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
|
I got the Ped. mount ones.. got a good deal on 1.7's... soo...
used the stock pushrods with no probs...if you get stud mount, you'll need hardened puchrods... ------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives BBK shorties stock cam, 1.7's 13.85@102.5 and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-) |
07-04-2001, 11:43 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Novato, (SF Bay Area) CA
Posts: 20
|
How heavy is your car dark knight? I am thinking of getting the afr 165's with 1.7 roller rockers and keeping the stock camshaft for a while, but i see that you have kinda low trap speeds with that combo. Just curious... Also, what chamber size do you have? 58, 60 or 64cc?
|
07-05-2001, 09:39 AM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
------------------ 94gt incon tt _ 11.66@124 455rwhp/476rwtq 68 stang 351w _ 12.99@106 my stangs |
|
07-05-2001, 12:20 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
|
SlowWhiteGT, 3400#... it's a convert..I was happy with the MPH...I'm running a performerEGR 4v intake and a 600 holley... I better intake will put it up around 105-106... BTW, the air temp was 106* when I ran the 102+ ;-)
FWIW, I went from 100.2 to 102.5 by just putting BBK headers on in place of the stock ones... I might still be able to pick up more MPH, that was the 1st time out with the headers...need to figure the best shift point... gonna dyno it next week... ------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives BBK shorties stock cam, 1.7's 13.85@102.5 and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a little help and guidance: neighbors calling cops. | thdrcat | Blue Oval Lounge | 13 | 07-30-2004 09:10 AM |
Question To Mustang Owners In North Carolina!!! | 1BadMoFo5.0 | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 05-29-2001 01:50 AM |
LS1 owners and their dumb@sses | TheSloAod | Stang Stories | 8 | 05-12-2001 01:59 PM |
Welcome truck owners! | StangFlyer | Built Ford Tough | 8 | 02-11-2001 01:43 PM |
69 owners, please read | Sean6990 | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 08-20-1999 11:47 PM |