MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums

MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums (http://forums.mustangworks.com/index.php)
-   Windsor Power (http://forums.mustangworks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Combustion chamber size (http://forums.mustangworks.com/showthread.php?t=26291)

Ieatcamaros 07-16-2002 10:08 PM

Combustion chamber size
 
I have a cylinder head dilemma going on here. I really like the trick flow TW series but I don't like the idea of having a 61cc combustion chamber. The only thing that I have found with a 58cc chamber are the GT-40x heads. But of course they $1250 versus the 1100 for the TF's. With the 3cc difference how much difference in Compression ratio are we talking? A stock bottom end. Also what would the power difference be? I have no plans whatsoever for a blower down the road. So I do want relatively high compression. Like 10:1. I do however plan on getting at least a dry 75 shot of N20. What do you guys suggest? I just can't make up my mind. I am using the trick flow street heat intake with the trick flow #1 cam.

82 GT 07-16-2002 10:17 PM

Ask Mach1, he seems to know everything about everything.

PKRWUD 07-16-2002 10:29 PM

Running 61cc chambers versus 58cc chambers, all other things being equal, will result in approx. .334 decrease in compression.

If you're not planning on adding any boost, I'd go for a goal of 10.5:1 compression. But that's just me.

Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros 07-17-2002 06:43 AM

Well, I was thinking that 10:1 would be a little better than 10.5:1 since I am planning on using nitrous. But if you think 10.5 is okay with nitrous, then I will consider it. What would the compression ratio be using 58cc heads? Thanks.

PKRWUD 07-17-2002 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ieatcamaros
What would the compression ratio be using 58cc heads? Thanks.
Good morning. When you add the typical space for the head gasket and the 4 valve reliefs in the piston top, and the the space above the top ring, 58cc heads on a stock bottom end will give you a 9.44:1 compression ratio.

:)

Take care,
-Chris

BilLster 07-17-2002 01:24 PM

you could always mill the tw heads to raise compression or wait
and select pistons to raise it for your combo.

Ieatcamaros 07-17-2002 04:08 PM

I thought about milling the trick flows, but I don't know the formula for calculating how much to take off in order to get the right combustion chamber size. I am a machinist, but I don't do auto machine work. Where I work, we do shut down and rebuild type work for other places. Anyhow, Chris could you be kind enough to share with me the formula you used to figure that compression ratio? Also, I didn't understand the 4 valve reliefs in each piston. There are only two valves per cylinder. Wouldn't the extra notches make me lose compression?

PKRWUD 07-17-2002 05:19 PM

4 notches means the same piston can be used in any cylinder.

The formula is as follows:

Cylinder volume for a 302 is 617.78cc.
The space above the top ring, and the space for the 4 notches, is 5.5cc.
The average head gasket has a crushed thickness of .047", which equals 9.68cc.
Your combustion chamber size is 58cc.
Add them all together and you have total cylinder volume:

617.78 + 5.5 + 9.68 + 58 = 690.97cc

Now, you divide that number by the total volume above the piston, or

58 + 5.5 + 9.68 = 73.19cc

690.97cc / 73.19cc = 9.4407705:1 Compression Ratio.

:)

Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros 07-17-2002 06:07 PM

Thanks Chris, you are the man! After I posted that question about the 4 notches, I got to thinking about it. And I figured that 4 notches meant you could use it in any cylinder. That was the only logical reason I could think of myself. BTW, do you have a formula to figure on how much it would take to mill off the trick flows to get a 58cc chamber? I know that all heads are different in chamber shape. So of course this would only work for the trick flows. Thanks again.

PKRWUD 07-17-2002 06:49 PM

A straight cut of .020" would reduce the chamber to approx 57.92cc.

Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros 07-17-2002 10:23 PM

D*mn Chris! It ain't the first time you've heard this and it certainly ain't the last. But we are very lucky to have you on our board. You da man!

I thought it would take a lot more than .02 to reduce the chamber size down to 58cc. I was thinkin at least .05. Now, if I cut .02 off the heads then I will have to have larger notches in the pistons. Right? I am pretty sure. But, Trick Flow says that the pistons don't need notching the way they have the valves set up. So, my question is, can I buy regular notched pistons from summit? Like I said in my first post of this thread, I am using the trick flow #1 cam. JIC, it is 275/279 with 1.6 rockers the lift is .499/.510.

PKRWUD 07-18-2002 12:04 AM

Now you're crossing into territory I don't feel comfortable enough to advise you in. Try calling Trick Flow.

Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros 07-20-2002 02:57 PM

I am pretty sure that I am going to go with the windsor jr. heads because they have the 58cc chamber and 1.94/1.60 valves. They will accept a cam with a lift up to .560" Even though they are cast iron. Weight is not my concern, but weight transfer is. What do you think of what combo I have come up with.

Windsor jr cast iron heads mentioned above.
Trick Flow #1 cam.
1.6 rollers.
Trick Flow street heat.

I think that is the cam I want with those heads. The thing I can't get straight is the intake. I am thinkin that maybe the cobra might be a better intake. What I am looking for is a street beast with a lot of lower end torque. I am a stop light to stop light kinda guy with occasional visits to the track. Also, I am probably going to add a shot of nitrous. Don't know what size, but it will be a dry kit since I am a nitrous newbie.

Ideas and suggestions are appreciated.

PKRWUD 07-20-2002 04:51 PM

I like the GT40, personally.

Take care,
-Chris

gtsr515 07-20-2002 06:18 PM

Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.

How ya been Chris?, been away awhile.

How's the dirt? still flyin' I'm sure, hey Chris, what effect does temperature have on dirt trackin'? do you have to deal with tire issues and suspension set-up with extreme temps or no?

My guess is hot weather would give you more traction because the track could be "bit" harder by your tires. Right or wrong?

Cold would make the track "harder?" thus slippery?

Later EECbreath!:D

Ieatcamaros 07-20-2002 06:31 PM

Quote:

Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.
I think he was talking about the intake manifold.

Anyway, why the GT-40 Chris? I already have the street heat. But if I was buying a new one, the gt-40 is $200 more.

I think the street heat will give me the most low and mid range power, but you know more than me. Which gaskets should I use? The ones to fit the intake or the heads. I assume which ever one requires less cutting. Thanks.

PKRWUD 07-20-2002 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gtsr515
Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.

How ya been Chris?, been away awhile.

How's the dirt? still flyin' I'm sure, hey Chris, what effect does temperature have on dirt trackin'? do you have to deal with tire issues and suspension set-up with extreme temps or no?

My guess is hot weather would give you more traction because the track could be "bit" harder by your tires. Right or wrong?

Cold would make the track "harder?" thus slippery?

Later EECbreath!:D

Hotter air temp usually means the track will dry out faster, and a dry track creates a condition known as dry slick. The best traction comes from a damp, tacky track. Put it this way; if the track tries to suck the shoes off your feet when you walk across it, it's perfect.

:)

Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros-
I prefer the Gt40 for personal reasons. I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates. There are too many variables. You'll be fine with what you have.

~C

Ieatcamaros 07-21-2002 10:30 AM

Quote:

I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates.
I understand that fully. Thanks for your input.

Mustangbelle306 07-21-2002 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PKRWUD

Ieatcamaros-
I prefer the Gt40 for personal reasons. I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates. There are too many variables. You'll be fine with what you have.

~C

That's a good way to be, Chris. Just an easy way to start arguments with some people, even if the GT40s WOULD be a better choice :).

What is a recommended compression ratio to run if you plan on adding forced induction later? I'm trying to read and learn about heads so my decison won't be made with personal opinions from others, but I'm still pretty much in the dark.

82gt, I think this board has endured enough of your personal vendatta. Please stop already :)

Mach 1 07-21-2002 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 82 GT
Ask Mach1, he seems to know everything about everything.
Interesting. 82 GT sent me a private message apoligising for his remarks in the thread about selling a car, stateing that he tends to lose his head and that he was wrong, and then he turns around and pulls some crap like this?

Whats the matter with you anyway?

I guess he is another one to never be trusted. Is there any real, honest people left in America? Seriously....Im so tired of the "stab you in the back losers" out there, guess 82 GT is no different than the majority of people out there anymore. Maybe I just expect too much from people?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.