![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
gear banger
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
|
![]() O.k, I have a question on why longer runners on a intake are better for low end power on every motor I can think of except the lt1. The lt1 has little or no runners at all but still makes all it's power before 6000rpm. If you put a intake like that on one of our motors you better be shifting at 7500rpm and above. It's not just a GM thing either. The ls1 has long runners, the old pile 305's had long runners, almost every fuel injected motor I think of has long runners except the lt1. Anyone know why the lt1 can pull this off?
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor 93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe Ricer hater's club member #49 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Intake with NITROUS!!!???? | NOSstang08690 | Power Adders | 9 | 09-09-2003 07:05 AM |
for large duration cam, long or short runner intake to go ? | HAITHAM | Windsor Power | 4 | 01-27-2002 06:34 AM |
OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' | QUIN | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-09-2001 01:58 PM |
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |
Intake runner polishing/smoothing | AxemanZZ | Windsor Power | 16 | 01-05-2001 02:40 PM |