

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 53
|
![]() i dunno what the stock gears on a 95 gt would be but im curious would a 3.73 and a 4.10 gear lose on gas mileage?? im only gettin 15 as is and i dont wanna go any lower than 12. thanx
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Tubbed and Juiced
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,861
|
![]() Your only getting 15? Tell me more about your combo....5- speed? I'm guessing an automatic with the kind of gas mileage your getting. I used to get 23mpg highway/city in my fox body 5 speed, with 3:55's. I need more info.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Photoshop Guru
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mecca, Indiana
Posts: 1,419
|
![]() If you're only getting 15mpg you are either putting your foot down too much, you have enough mods for your car to be considered a drag car only, or you have tuning issues. My last Stang ran mid 13's and got 18mpg even with my lead foot. That was with 3.73 gears. Your car is a bit heavier so that will make some difference, but I can't see 15mpg on a daily driven Stang. More info is needed, but generally stepping up in gear size isn't going to make a ton of difference unless you do a lot of highway driving. And even then it won't be so much you should regret the gear swap. 75% of my driving was on the highway and I never really noticed any difference myself.
__________________
Project: 1988 Coupe - EFI 5.8L Twin Turbo with Victor intake, Canfield heads, F303 cam, March aluminum underdrive pulleys, TKO (or T56 if funds permit), PBR twin piston calipers and 13" rotors up front, 94 Cobra rear calipers and 12" rotors on the rear, 3.73's, Griggs K-member, tubular front control arms, torque arm and panhard bar, polished 99 Cobra wheels. "The GR-40 kit installation is now complete, and the humble Fox-chassis car will now out-corner and out-stop a ZR-1 or a Viper, and support massive horsepower additions with perfect balance." Griggs Racing ICQ# 42269241 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
![]() I switched from 2.73 to 3.55 with little to no real difference in MPG. Of course, I don't drive my Mustang enough to really make a difference for me. It's just a fun car for the weekends, nice days, and the track.
E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles 331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials 12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 53
|
![]() sorry for takin so long but....i have a completely stock 95 gt vert. i had the car tuned no longer than 7 months ago. no mods on it at all. like i said, bare stock. i have never really gotten anything more than 15 and i ALWAYS drive it hard. im still just a teenager so i like to punch it off the start. ive gotten it down to 13 mpg sometimes but hw mpg is about 18-19. never gotten more than that. anything i should look for to see better gas mileage and also about my main question...
how many mpg am i lookin to lose if i go to 3.73 or 4.10?? thanx for any info given |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 53
|
![]() bump....er
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vestal, NY
Posts: 307
|
![]() Same here. I'm not really sure what the Size of my tank is, cuz i've never filled it up from empty, as my gas gauge drops off with 1/4 tank left. I've got a stock '91 5spd. and I'm getting about 240mph combined highway and street use. Although I'm not driving it hard either on highway or street. It's still not the kinda weather here in NY that I wanna be running hard. Running on the highway at about...1800-2000 rpms, and about 1900rpms in 4th gear for street..if not a little less. Oh and I have 2.73's in it. Any ideas on how i Could Improve this?
__________________
1989 Mustang 5.0 Conversion, Full Saleen ground effects and spoiler, '94 saleen decal set, '93 Saleen Seats, Black interior from a '93, Steeda quadrant, smog pump delete, a/c delete, Steeda Tri-Ax shifter, '97 rear differential, aluminum driveshaft, 5 lug conversion, '97 rear disc brakes, southside upper and lower control arms, '99 GT Anniversary wheels, flowtech longtubes, flowtech offroad H-pipe, saleen lowering springs, kyb shocks, caster/camber plates |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
![]() Stang39r - It depends. It depends on how you are going to drive your Mustang. Are you going to continue to keep your foot in the throttle all the time - like you are now, hence the crappy gas mileage. Or, are you going to ease up a bit? If you could tone down your driving style, you could probably throw in some 3.73's and hardly notice a difference in MPG. However, if you keep the lead foot, MPG will decrease, maybe by as much a 2 MPG.
It all really depends on you. E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles 331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials 12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
![]() Quote:
![]() E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles 331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials 12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
![]() Rosco-
You don't need to know the size of your tank. To figure your mileage, fill the tank as high as you can, and write down the mileage. Drive it until you get to the point where you normally fill it up. Fill it up, and write down how many gallons it takes. Do this for 3 fill-ups, writing down the amount of gallons it takes to fill it each time. After the third time, add together the gallon totals from the three fill-ups. Check your mileage. Subtract the mileage you wrote down before the first fill-up from the mileage after the third fill-up. Divide that number by the gallon total. That is your average gas mileage. You can do it on fewer fill-ups, but it won't be as accurate. Posting this number will give everyone a better idea of where you're at. Stang39r- Expect to see a drop of between 2 and 3mpg with the gear change. Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
![]() FWIW, I was told that more aggressive gears provide better city mpg, all else being equal. The steeper gears are supposed to promote higher vacuum levels during city driving, which equates to better mpg.
One of these days, I will put in those 3.55s I've had sitting in my garage for the past 7 years ![]()
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() NO SLO PK:
Steeper differential gears will allow you to upshift (to a higher transmission gear) sooner - especially in traffic - which saves gas, as the lower the (transmisssion) gear you're in, the higher the engine RPM, which in turn uses more gasoline. The 5.0 engine is interesting when it comes to gas mileage. I find that if I watch my driving and use cruise control I can get mid-20's on the highway, easily (I saw 28 mpg on one 500 mile trip) By the same token, if i get in it just a bit, WHAM! I'm looking at low-teens or worse for mileage...and I'm near-stock. I drive somewhat aggressively but not to the point of really 'beating' my Mustang and I consistantly see an average of about 18 mpg with a well-tuned, near stock, 5-speed 5.0 running 3.55 gears. Go figure. FYI: Cold temperatures have a negative effect on gas mileage. You can lose a few mpg in really cold weather, plus if you idle a lot to 'warm it up', you're getting zero mpg, then. It all factors in. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
![]() 5.0:
I suppose there's that angle too. But in city driving, the steeper geers will permit the car to accelerate using less throttle. Less throttle equates to a higher vacuum condition, which directly relates to reduced fuel consumption. Many fuel economy gauges use engine vacuum as input. The higher the vacuum the better the mpg.
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
I got something to say
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,557
|
![]() I always get like 14.5 - 15 mpg. However this is ALL in town no highway at all as it is my daily driver to school and work both of which are not very far from home. I dont drive it very hard but i wouldnt say that i baby it
![]() Later
__________________
91 LX Hatch 5.0 - made for the twisties 89 LX Hatchback 5.0 5spd. stolen/stripped 4/7/05 ![]() http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?3494 1987 Toyota Pickup Ricer Haters Club Member #33 Want a custom gauge cluster for your Vintage Mustang? www.jmeenterprises.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
loss of power suddenly | jimdrechsler | Windsor Power | 17 | 09-30-2004 08:49 PM |
Gears Gears Gears!!!! | COBRAon18s | Modular Madness | 20 | 05-13-2002 04:44 PM |
how can you tell what size gears you have? | Kamaro Killer | Windsor Power | 7 | 04-03-2002 02:55 PM |
Gears, need help!!!! | Edgar Negron | Windsor Power | 3 | 05-27-2001 03:10 PM |
Gears Gears Gears | Skyman | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-11-2001 11:39 PM |