DO NOT PUT GLASSPACKS ON A 5.0 MUSTANG!!! YOU DO NOT DRIVE A SMALL BLOCK CHEVY STREET ROD.

Unit:

That's why I stayed away from Dynomax, I heard them on a car and it sounded like a small block chevy with glass packs. I am not trying to be a wise a$$, but that is seriously why I stayed away from Dynomax.

Aren't Dynomax super turbo's straight through with fiberglass packing. I haven't heard of the ultra flos, do they sound better than the other Dynomax mufflers? I would consider these if they sound better than the super turbo's and have less drone that the flowmasters.

Thanks,

Jason

I had my full exhaust aluminized and then coated with HTC. Voala less heat more power and no rust. Even where it was welded they coated. I had the shop show me different types of mufflers like borla, edelbrock, and dynomax and to tell you the truth they seemed cheaply made. The ones I really liked other than the flows where the polished edelbrocks.

------------------
67'fastback-Edelbrock carb,intake,cam,valve springs.Rhode lifters, CompCam rocker arms, windage tray,cerama coated headers,dual flows with H-pipe, modded c-4,tci stall converter,perma cool electric fan,aluminum water pump,griffen aluminum radiator,accel 8.8 cable,wide cap distriburator,magnetic pick up,v-matic hurst shifter,edelbrock performer nitrous, carter electric fuel pump,ignitor coil,solid motor mounts,magna racing suspension,poly urathane bushings,under rider traction bars, comp. eng. s

Well, here is my $.02...
I have Super Turbos on my car currently, and i really like the sound. I bought my car almost a year ago and the Super Turbos were on it already. If i could choose any system regardless of price i would probably go with Bassani. They have some of the best craftsmanship and flow and sound good too. Unfortuantely, they cost an outrageous amount. Otherwise, i think you can't really go wrong with Dynomax, Flows, or MAC. They each have a unique sound, but they all sound alot better than stock. If you have a track near by, go on a test and tune night. Talk with some of the guys running their Stangs and listen to them in person if possible. Anyway, good luck.

------------------
'89 GT- Pro 5.0 shifter, alum. driveshaft, C/F Dual-Fric. Clutch, BBK shorties, MAC H-Pipe, Dynomax Super Turbo Cat-Back, more to come...

Blk89GT, i was at the track friday night & i herd lots of nice sounding 5.0s, but the one I liked the most (MikeBlackGT) had 3 chamber flos, & i loved the sound :-p they wernt to loud, but had an awesome rumbel. so when i finally get the $$$ for the cat-back it will be a flowmaster forceII 3 chamber.

GLASSPACKS OR NO MUFFLERS???
thats the question till i get some real $$$

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
3.08's, No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe, K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box), Removed air silendcerMy Stang
My Site (Not Done Yet)

Regardless of sound, dynomax cat back system fits much better and installs easier because of the fit. Ive had dyno and flow (2 chamber). I sold the flows because they sound like crap with off-road h-pipe, unless you want to sound like tin cans dragging behind your car. go with dynomax, u wont be dissapointed in sound or fit.

[This message has been edited by Mach 1 (edited 05-13-2001).]

well, i really like the sound of the 3 chambers, not to loud, & a nice rumbel