Dynomax vs. Flowmaster
 

ok, to settel a dispute, i am posting this.

Flowmasters arn't as good for turbos because of there chambered design. dynomax ultra flos will out flow the flowmaster 50series.

Am i right?

thanks

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
3.08's, No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe, K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box), Removed Air SilencerMy Stang
My Site (Not Done Yet)

I've also heard that flows are bad on turbo engines. And I belive ulta flows do outflow flowmasters.

------------------
DEAD(FRIED TRANS)
1990 Dodge Dynasty with 275,000 miles. Mods:chiped paint, CD player. Sucks but it was free. Praying for a stang.
The "Guetto Glider"
http://cwm.ragesofsanity.com/s/net2/burnout.gif

If it ain't broke, you ain't tryin hard enough

When I purchasd my car it had hooker aero chambers on it. Shortly thereafter I upgraded my exhaust and switched to the dynomax ultra flo welded and I can tell a big difference. The turbo spools alot quicker now than before. I'm sure some of that comes from the upgrade from 2 1/4" to 2 1/2". I'm not certain whether the hookers are chambers of straight thru and I've not got any experience with flowmasters on a turbo car, but everyone I talked to before I purchased my mufflers said to stay away from anything with chambers. Hope this helps.