MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-27-2002, 09:46 PM   #1
fongo
Registered Member
 
fongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Farmingdale, NY
Posts: 139
Lightbulb fuel pump choice...fuel economy???

Hi everyone! Well, the inevitable just happened! My stock fuel pump went on me today. I know I have choices to replace it, but that depends on the fuel economy. With my 88 LHP stock pump, I was getting about 15-16 mpg on the road.
Based on all of your experience, what would be the impact on fuel economy given what I have on the car (see my signature) if I have get any of the following as replacements?
1. 110 LHP
2. 155 LHP
3. 200 LHP
Is it worth it, or should I stay with the stock 88 LHP replacement. I do regular driving and and ocassional tire spinning down the blvd. here and then.
Thanks!
fongo
__________________
1993 GT, MAC Fenderwell Cold Air Induction; Accel dist.,Splitfire plugs, BBK: 1 5/8 unequal length shorties, hi flow H-pipe w/ cats; Flowmasters 2 chamber American Thunder catback system, Motorsports 3-core radiator, 180º thermostat, BBK adj. clutch quad...the rest is bone stock!..but more mods to come!!
fongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2002, 05:44 AM   #2
lx mike
Undescribable
 
lx mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
Default

Changing to a higher rated fuel pump will not make a difference in your gas mileage at all.

plemty of people are running around 155-190 lph and even 255 lph fuel pumps.
__________________
Rice Haters Club Member #101
lx mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2002, 06:36 AM   #3
Stang Runner
Registered Member
 
Stang Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Walker, MI, USA
Posts: 1,202
Default

I would get like a 190 less you plan to go for more than like 400 HP no real need to get a 255 it will just be a wast of a pump hehe and it will heat up the fuel more as well.
__________________
Engine: steel mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, GT-40 Intake ported Lower, No power steering, No A/C, Mac cold intake, 65MM TB, 255 Fuel pump, 24's, AFR 165 58cc, Rocker Arms 1.7with the stock Cam, 1 5/8 short headers, offRoad X-pipe
Drive Train: 3.55, T-5 with a Pro 5.0 shifter
12.656@107.71MPH See It at www.T-racing.com/mustang.htm
Stang Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2002, 10:03 AM   #4
fongo
Registered Member
 
fongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Farmingdale, NY
Posts: 139
Default

Thanks everyone. Actually, if I get a 155 LHP pump I can save up to $100 compared to stock (apprx. 155 LHP=$80 vs stock 88 LHP kit=$180). I think I'll do that!
Chao!
fongo
__________________
1993 GT, MAC Fenderwell Cold Air Induction; Accel dist.,Splitfire plugs, BBK: 1 5/8 unequal length shorties, hi flow H-pipe w/ cats; Flowmasters 2 chamber American Thunder catback system, Motorsports 3-core radiator, 180º thermostat, BBK adj. clutch quad...the rest is bone stock!..but more mods to come!!
fongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Pump Problems blue302 Windsor Power 3 07-08-2005 10:18 PM
fuel pump not running !??? whitepony Windsor Power 3 04-28-2004 07:26 PM
Rebuild Questions? 5.0L_Of_Fury Windsor Power 5 12-29-2002 11:39 AM
Possible Fuel pump failure FiveORookie Windsor Power 1 12-23-2002 01:28 PM
Fuel Pump Replacement KobraLX Windsor Power 1 07-31-2001 12:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.


SEARCH