

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
![]() I have a god idea about the flow intake flow rate on cylinder heads, but how does the exhaust flow rate change how the engine performs.
The reason I'm asking is that the AFR's have more exhuast flow than TFS heads and I'm trying to consider which head to go with (in the near future). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Albuq, NM
Posts: 21
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() I think your exhaust (headers, h or x pipe) will make more of a difference in how your engine will perform than a couple more cfm's from one head over the other. Since the exhaust is sucked out of the head by the scavenging of the headers and pumped out by the pistons you obviously don't need as high of exhaust flow as intake (Wait a minute, you're an engineer so there's no need for me to state the obvious). Anyways I believe that both heads have enough exhaust flow to support the intake flow and since the TFS heads are usually a couple hundred dollars less (Actually about $400 less for those of us still stuck here in Canada
![]()
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Walker, MI, USA
Posts: 1,202
|
![]() I realy like my AFR heads. it is Up to you they both are very good heads the TFS TW with a little port work would be right about the same. I went with the AFR heads myself.
__________________
Engine: steel mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, GT-40 Intake ported Lower, No power steering, No A/C, Mac cold intake, 65MM TB, 255 Fuel pump, 24's, AFR 165 58cc, Rocker Arms 1.7with the stock Cam, 1 5/8 short headers, offRoad X-pipe Drive Train: 3.55, T-5 with a Pro 5.0 shifter 12.656@107.71MPH See It at www.T-racing.com/mustang.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() To my understanding, you want exhaust flow at 75% for a N/A engine, and 80% for a S/C.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
|
![]() thats easy, go with the AFR's. completly CNC ported, however, AFR uses cheap valve springs, so you might want to upgrade those if using a large lift cam.
Last edited by Mach 1; 02-02-2002 at 03:50 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
![]() Thanks guys. I wasn't sure why the AFR's had so much exhuast flow compared to the TFS heads. I was looking for that 75% rule of thumb answer I guess.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intake flow numbers.. | dragstang86 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-16-2003 09:18 PM |
ported GT40P flow numbers, and pictures | fiveohpatrol | Windsor Power | 16 | 12-12-2002 02:41 PM |
exhaust cross-overs?? | Simi Stang | Windsor Power | 7 | 12-09-2002 01:20 PM |
Intake flow numbers | VeNuM | Windsor Power | 0 | 12-06-2002 09:10 PM |
Need Flow Charts on diff heads.. | NewAge 5.0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 09-25-2001 01:19 PM |