MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-01-2002, 03:14 PM   #1
Jmark
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tejas, USA
Posts: 8
Default FRPP 392 and Other 393 stroker engines

Can anyone tell me what the difference is between a 392 and 393 stroked engine??


Thank you!
__________________
J. Mark


MY Vehicles:
72 Mach 1 351 CJ
89 5.0 LX (2003 Project Car)
2001 Red Lightning #2633
Best ET / MPH 13.203 / 106.34
Jmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2002, 03:27 PM   #2
BilLster
Registered Member
 
BilLster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ontario canada
Posts: 446
Default

no just rounding mine was originally advertised as a 395
but its like 394 if you calculate it properly with the .030 overbore.
__________________
89 with 331 t3'/t4 hybrids. upr Suspention worked out finnaly . 9.89 144 mph .
BilLster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2002, 03:37 PM   #3
tarmon8r
Registered Member
 
tarmon8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: manassas, va
Posts: 186
Default

it all depends on how far u carry pie out to. u know the funny symbol in the formula for determinng the volume of a cylinder
3.14...............
__________________
1983 mustang, 393 cubic inch stroker small block, victor jr heads and intake, gold race 1.6 roller rockers. comp cam 304, 244@ .050. .576" hydralic retro roller cam,lunati rods. block was o-ringed,10:1 forged pistons, speed pro fit fit rings, clevite bearings,msd distributor and igniton,be cool huge radiator, black lite electric fan, march underdrive pulleys, mildon deep sump oil pan, mac 1 3.4" long tube headers, 3" dr gas x-pipe and mac exhaust,ARP bolts. car weighs 2900 lbs w/out driver, sub frames, weld wheels, mickey thompson sportsman pro 26 x 10.5 x 15's,#8 fuel line steel braided
tarmon8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2002, 04:00 PM   #4
Jmark
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tejas, USA
Posts: 8
Default So.....I would say in liters....

Were looking at an engine displacement of 6.4 liters!

I'm sitting here, eating some shocklate pie, contemplating on ordering a new badge for my stang LOL....
__________________
J. Mark


MY Vehicles:
72 Mach 1 351 CJ
89 5.0 LX (2003 Project Car)
2001 Red Lightning #2633
Best ET / MPH 13.203 / 106.34
Jmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2002, 06:59 PM   #5
tarmon8r
Registered Member
 
tarmon8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: manassas, va
Posts: 186
Default

been there, done that, got that badge
just took a 4.6 and switched the numbers......lol
__________________
1983 mustang, 393 cubic inch stroker small block, victor jr heads and intake, gold race 1.6 roller rockers. comp cam 304, 244@ .050. .576" hydralic retro roller cam,lunati rods. block was o-ringed,10:1 forged pistons, speed pro fit fit rings, clevite bearings,msd distributor and igniton,be cool huge radiator, black lite electric fan, march underdrive pulleys, mildon deep sump oil pan, mac 1 3.4" long tube headers, 3" dr gas x-pipe and mac exhaust,ARP bolts. car weighs 2900 lbs w/out driver, sub frames, weld wheels, mickey thompson sportsman pro 26 x 10.5 x 15's,#8 fuel line steel braided
tarmon8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.


SEARCH