![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() What a cheap POS.......It is too small......too flimsy....falls off all the time.....and is inaccurate as hell on the mph.
Not impressed.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
motors done......woohooo
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 799
|
![]() i was just wondering if you were putting the g-tech up high enough on your window cause if its not high enough ti ill not read right. but yes i agree with you it isnt the most accurate thing. the e-t was always within 2 tenths though. i wouldnt spend the money to buy own.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() I didn't have any issues with the one I was using. What were you trapping on the Gtech?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Jose, California USA
Posts: 275
|
![]() I dont have too many problems with mine. I trap in the 104's (104.3-104.9). My friends mostly stock LT1 camaro traps in the 105's. I think they're off by about 4-5 MPH or 4.5% or so.
__________________
1993 Grabber Blue Mustang GT Trick Flow Heads, Street Heat intake, 3/8in spacer, E303, TFS 1.7rr & 6.75 pushrods, Holley 190lph fuel pump, 24# injectors & sample tube, SVO timing chain, Aeromotive AFPR, 180* t-stat, 2 5/8 Auto Meter mech fuel pressure gauge, K&N, March Ram Air & Pullies, 73mm C&L MAF, Edelbrock 65mm TB & EGR, 1 5/8in Equal Length Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2in H-Pipe w/hi-flow cats & Flowmaster 2 1/2in Cat-Back Exhaust, FlowTech Cut-Outs, Nitto DR's, 3.73 gears, FMS Aluminum DriveShaft, Pro 5.0 Shifter, Pro-Shift Lite, 8.5mm MSD Super Cunductor Plug Wires, PowerSlot rotors, PowerMaster 140amp Alt., LX lights, Cobra R hood w/SVO scoop, Saleen spoiler, Cobra Bumper, 3in chrome tips. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() I know for a fact that my truck runs a 16.4 @84mph all day long so I G-teched it for an accuracy test. 16.33 @88mph.
My stang G-teched 13.8 @103mph......I will see how accurate it is tomorrow night at the track. Later,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
![]() Actually, I think that G-tech is supposed to be pretty accurate. However, the manner in which it runs its calculations is a little different than how it's done at your local track.
A while back there was a really good thread on the G-techs, how they work, how they differ from the tracks way of measurment, etc. I've always like to compare track ET & MPH's with people. Some folks like to see that high MPH and equate that to a much lower ET than their car is capable of. E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles 331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials 12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tech? | Maroon91LX | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 03-04-2004 11:32 PM |
02 extentions--website for Interactive Tech? | Jason Van Holland | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-25-2001 02:07 PM |
Atlanta Tech Results | George Klass | Racer's Club House | 1 | 04-23-1999 08:44 PM |