carb manifold opinions

matt cook · 10-01-2001, 02:22 PM

here goes -
I am putting ported E7TE's on my stock 115k mile short block this winter along with 1.7 roller rockers and keeping the stock cam. this car is not raced, just a good weather, fun car that is never taken above 5500 rpm. here is my question, what intake would give me more all-around performance. Performer/Performer RPM/Weiand Stealth are what I have been thinking of...if you have these or have knowledge, gimme your opinions.

thanks

Coupe Devil · 10-01-2001, 02:25 PM

I'd try the Weiand Stealth. Thats what I'll be using next race season. Dual plane, great for low end and very affordable.

------------------
'93 lx notch 4 banger (drive it to work currently), Using the 306, 8.8 posi, 4.10's, summit rear cover, elec. fan, cowl hood, wieand stealth intake, holley 650 d.p.carb., built c-4, e-303, full autometer guages, msd box, mallory unilite dist, and coil, roll cage, summit seat, subs, 15x10's in the back with slicks, skinnies up front, all in use for 1988 Hatch Drag Car. Hope to start running next year. Hoping for 7.20's after all is done with small motor.

matt cook · 10-01-2001, 03:21 PM

I was really thinkin' of going with the Stealth just to be different - it seems that everybody runs performers.

any more opinions?

I will add that I currently have 3.08's...

PKRWUD · 10-01-2001, 11:59 PM

I have not tried the Stealth, but have had excellent results with the RPM.

Take care
~Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: JimPorterRacing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN. The best tool you'll ever have, and it's free !!!

90dpscoupe · 10-02-2001, 12:23 AM

Friend of mine runs a victor jr. intk, but you said you will stay under 5500 rpms, just thought id mention, it had lots of power, even down low, peak powerband was in the 5500+6000 range, of course the nos helped

WADS56 · 10-02-2001, 12:27 AM

I ran a performer on my 83 and liked it. Good all around power

------------------
79 hatch w/ NA 347,stage 2 Canfield heads, out of the box Victor 5.0 intake, solid roller cam, Aeromotive fuel system, proshifted TKO II.MY CAR http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?1288
93lx all stock + tremec

Dark Knight · 10-02-2001, 02:54 PM

what year? if you need to keep the EGR, go for the performer.. FWIW, on my car, stock cam, 1.7's 600 holley and AFR heads, I lost .2 and 2mph in the 1/4 going from a performer to the RPM... go figure...

------------------
84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer
3.55's, underdrives BBK shorties
stock cam, 1.7's
13.85@102.5
and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-)

Five0 · 10-02-2001, 04:25 PM

I just switched back to the performer rpm from the vic jr intake and I picked up a lot of power that I lost with the vic jr. My car with the 302 ran a 12.5@109 with the performer rpm intake.

------------------
James Cox
nochevy@hotmail.com
1991 Mustang LX
No good times with 347 stroker yet!

todd95GT · 10-02-2001, 04:42 PM

71 Chevelle: 350 c.i., 10:1 compression, hydraulic cam, Barry Grant 750 DP, Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold, port matched to the heads, plenum notched and smoothed. About 3400 pounds plus me @ 220, ran 11.97 @ 111.5mph. Shifted @ 6200 but it had great torque down below.

------------------
Todd
1995 GT/T-5
Pulleys; 65 mm TB; Flowmaster cat-back; Mac off road H-pipe; FMS aluminum driveshaft; short-throw shifter; HD clutch; Cobra R's; Cobra front and wing

matt cook · 10-02-2001, 06:57 PM

thanks guys

some info - it will be a stock 82 5.0 shortblock that currently has a 1985 4 barrel intake (82 gt's came with a two barrel) and a Carter AFB. I don't care if I lose a little bit down low (it has alot of torque) as long as it is smooth 2000-5700 or so (I'm rethinkin' the RPM now that I'll have new valve springs...)

keep the opinions comin'

6T9PONY · 10-03-2001, 12:03 AM

I'd agree with you. Performer RPM. If not that, then the Performer.

------------------
Previously "BennyBoy"
'69 Coupe with 351W-I rolled it 8/8
Edelbrock RPM intake, Edelbrock RPM cam, Edelbrock 750 cfm carb, Hedman headers, 2 1/2" pipe, glasspacks, C4: shift kit, 9" Currie: Trac-Lok 3.70s, 290hp-stock heads

10-01-2001, 02:22 PM	#1
matt cook Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: Richmond, Virginia Posts: 449	carb manifold opinions here goes - I am putting ported E7TE's on my stock 115k mile short block this winter along with 1.7 roller rockers and keeping the stock cam. this car is not raced, just a good weather, fun car that is never taken above 5500 rpm. here is my question, what intake would give me more all-around performance. Performer/Performer RPM/Weiand Stealth are what I have been thinking of...if you have these or have knowledge, gimme your opinions. thanks

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Couple of exhaust and carb upgrade questions	5.0 Fiend	Windsor Power	6	08-18-2004 08:25 AM
Need opinions on new combo about headers and carb size.	ciara	Windsor Power	2	10-05-2003 10:36 PM
to carb, or not to carb...this is my question.	black86notch	Windsor Power	4	08-06-2002 08:24 PM
Carb Woahs	RoadWarrior	Classic Mustangs	4	07-27-2002 11:06 AM
new carb..but how much cfm??	69PonyRider	Classic Mustangs	4	09-13-2001 07:59 AM

10-01-2001, 02:25 PM	#2
Coupe Devil Moderator Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Myrtle Beach SC Posts: 1,643	I'd try the Weiand Stealth. Thats what I'll be using next race season. Dual plane, great for low end and very affordable. ------------------ '93 lx notch 4 banger (drive it to work currently), Using the 306, 8.8 posi, 4.10's, summit rear cover, elec. fan, cowl hood, wieand stealth intake, holley 650 d.p.carb., built c-4, e-303, full autometer guages, msd box, mallory unilite dist, and coil, roll cage, summit seat, subs, 15x10's in the back with slicks, skinnies up front, all in use for 1988 Hatch Drag Car. Hope to start running next year. Hoping for 7.20's after all is done with small motor.

10-01-2001, 03:21 PM	#3
matt cook Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: Richmond, Virginia Posts: 449	I was really thinkin' of going with the Stealth just to be different - it seems that everybody runs performers. any more opinions? I will add that I currently have 3.08's...

10-01-2001, 11:59 PM	#4
PKRWUD Junior Member Join Date: Mar 1999 Location: Ventura, California Posts: 8,981	I have not tried the Stealth, but have had excellent results with the RPM. Take care ~Chris ------------------ Retired Moderator MustangNet My site: JimPorterRacing RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN. The best tool you'll ever have, and it's free !!!

10-02-2001, 12:23 AM	#5
90dpscoupe Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: sanantonio, Tx, usa Posts: 1,407	Friend of mine runs a victor jr. intk, but you said you will stay under 5500 rpms, just thought id mention, it had lots of power, even down low, peak powerband was in the 5500+6000 range, of course the nos helped

10-02-2001, 12:27 AM	#6
WADS56 gear banger Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: CHICAGO Posts: 1,144	I ran a performer on my 83 and liked it. Good all around power ------------------ 79 hatch w/ NA 347,stage 2 Canfield heads, out of the box Victor 5.0 intake, solid roller cam, Aeromotive fuel system, proshifted TKO II.MY CAR http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?1288 93lx all stock + tremec

10-02-2001, 02:54 PM	#7
Dark Knight Registered Member Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Az Posts: 854	what year? if you need to keep the EGR, go for the performer.. FWIW, on my car, stock cam, 1.7's 600 holley and AFR heads, I lost .2 and 2mph in the 1/4 going from a performer to the RPM... go figure... ------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives BBK shorties stock cam, 1.7's 13.85@102.5 and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-)

10-02-2001, 04:25 PM	#8
Five0 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: middleburg, fl, usa Posts: 1,134	I just switched back to the performer rpm from the vic jr intake and I picked up a lot of power that I lost with the vic jr. My car with the 302 ran a 12.5@109 with the performer rpm intake. ------------------ James Cox nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX No good times with 347 stroker yet!

10-02-2001, 04:42 PM	#9
todd95GT Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, USA Posts: 191	71 Chevelle: 350 c.i., 10:1 compression, hydraulic cam, Barry Grant 750 DP, Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold, port matched to the heads, plenum notched and smoothed. About 3400 pounds plus me @ 220, ran 11.97 @ 111.5mph. Shifted @ 6200 but it had great torque down below. ------------------ Todd 1995 GT/T-5 Pulleys; 65 mm TB; Flowmaster cat-back; Mac off road H-pipe; FMS aluminum driveshaft; short-throw shifter; HD clutch; Cobra R's; Cobra front and wing

10-02-2001, 06:57 PM	#10
matt cook Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: Richmond, Virginia Posts: 449	thanks guys some info - it will be a stock 82 5.0 shortblock that currently has a 1985 4 barrel intake (82 gt's came with a two barrel) and a Carter AFB. I don't care if I lose a little bit down low (it has alot of torque) as long as it is smooth 2000-5700 or so (I'm rethinkin' the RPM now that I'll have new valve springs...) keep the opinions comin'

10-03-2001, 12:03 AM	#11
6T9PONY All about the Windsor. Join Date: Feb 2000 Posts: 2,052	I'd agree with you. Performer RPM. If not that, then the Performer. ------------------ Previously "BennyBoy" '69 Coupe with 351W-I rolled it 8/8 Edelbrock RPM intake, Edelbrock RPM cam, Edelbrock 750 cfm carb, Hedman headers, 2 1/2" pipe, glasspacks, C4: shift kit, 9" Currie: Trac-Lok 3.70s, 290hp-stock heads