

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() I recently bought a new CC Exe 268 H (268/280 H - 224/230 @.050) to replace my old 268 H (218/218 H @.050) cam. As recommended, I am checking the valve/piston clearance. I'm doing it with both the dial indicater and the modeling clay method ( my machine shop doesn't like modeling clay).
To make a long story short, it looks like I will have plenty of clearance with my existing 1.7 rockers giving about .540 I / .544 E lift with the new cam. With the 1.6 rockers I'll have .5.09 / 5.12 lift. I already have the TF 1.7 rockers from my old set up. I have 1.6 TF rockers on back order from Summit. I guess my question is, do I really want the .540 /.544 lift even though I can get it without clearance problems. It would save me $240 returning the 1.6 TF rockers to Summit. I've heard that around .500 is a good top limit for valve lift limit on street driven flat tappet cams. I can have either the 1.7 rocker .540 / .544 or the 1.6 rocker .509 / .512 lift as I choose. Do I really want extra wear with the 1.7's as apposed to the 1.6 .509 / .512? That's my dlleimma. Any advice appreciated. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dilemma - my 16-year old | Mustang_289 | Blue Oval Lounge | 52 | 12-27-2002 12:49 AM |
1.7's and valve covers, HELP! | srv1 | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-02-2002 10:37 PM |
TFS TW, milling 1.7's and E303 | Skyman | Windsor Power | 4 | 05-14-2002 06:21 PM |
1.7's with the stock cam. | Dark_5.0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-07-2002 01:02 PM |
Huge dilemma! Need advice! | VNAMUS in VA | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 07-03-2001 11:55 PM |