

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() Ok my car is all taken apart and this is the deepest I have ever gone into a fuel injection motor.
I have new parts to install GT-40 intake , port and polished stock heads and 1.7 roller rockers. Question #1...should I use the 1.7 roller rockers or would I get more out of a b-303 cam. #2...Does the GT-40 intake flow too good for my current set-up #3 Is it time for a custom burned chip or would it be a waist of money on a SPEED DENSITY setup #4 Will the GT-40 intake clear tall valve covers or will I need a spacer. #5 When I put the injectors in the GT-40 intake do I lube them with anything or just pop em in there Any help would be appreciated....Hoping for LOW 14's I also have subframes and slicks to install before march when the track opens
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,575
|
![]() If you plan on getting heads I would wait for the install. A intake doesn't do much for power with out heads. Put it this way, I put on my GT-40 heads and ran 12.9s and then put a cam and intake on at the same time and only picked up .2. It's alot easyer to put the heads and intake on all at once, then you dont' have to worrie about taking it all off again. Just my $.02
__________________
87 GT, Cobra R's,GT-40 heads,Crane 2031,1.7's, Edelbrock intake, long tubes,BBK cold air, Mass air,pulleys,Pro 5.0, King Cobra,Lakewood Lift Bars,50/50's,subframes, 4.10's. Best time 12.759 Best MPH 106.79 Best 60' 1.695 71 Nova SS 350, 4 spd. 4.11s, ect..... Visit my site at: http://www.geocities.com/cobrar93_2000/MyPage.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() your GT40 will compliment your ported stock heads very well, thats basically what I have and it runs great together, i've got 1.7s with the stock cam, and a B303 will go in in about 6-7 weeks
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Utica, Michigan
Posts: 2,631
|
![]() The B cam is a better choice than just adding 1.7 rockers, no the GT-40 does not flow too well for your set-up. It is perfect for your combo.
You may have surging idle problems with the B-cam and speed density. In fact, you probably will. You will need a spacer for the intake. Put a touch of Vaseline on the o-rings when you install them. Just enough to make them look shiny.
__________________
1988 Mustang GT stock bottom 302, C4 10.9 @ 128 with 8 psi of Novi 1000 boost!----STOLEN 1989 Mustang notchback Warmed up 306 with a Procharger. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() What size spacer will I need 1'inch I am asuming........I am also getting rid of these bosch 4 prong plugs cause its hard to tune when you cant change the plug gap.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: greenvile, NC
Posts: 161
|
![]() Definelty get a set of copper plugs, autolite or ngk. Which valve covers do you have?
A 1" spacer will increase the length of your intake runners which will promote more low end torque but will lower the rpm at which peak hp is achieved. Since you don't have a cam your hp will peak somewhat low anyway, so it may work well. But if you ever add a cam you might want to consider a smaller spacer. You might want to consider switching to mass air. Speed density cars are very picky when it comes to increasing air flow, you may have some surging problems even without the cam, definelty with the cam. A custom chip may be needed to fix driveablity problems. You may also not see the increase in power you expect, due to the computer not compensating for the extra airflow like a mass airflow setup. Brad
__________________
89' Notch Stroked Poked & BLOWN low 11's and it goes around corners too Parts for Sale!! http://www.lowkey.stangnet.com/catalog.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() Quote:
I have seen people on this board running 11's and 12's with speed density. If I cant run mid 13's with speed density then I will switch to mass air but I will avoid it if possible. I think that I am going to try the ngk plugs, I also need to find a fan shroud so I can put my flex fan back on, the electric fan that I have now pulls too much of an electrical load load. I have ford motorsport valve covers to go with the 1.7 roller rockers
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() Yah those NGK plugs are great. My car seemed to run better with them than the Autolite 25's I have now. The NGK has a small groove in the electrode that supposdely prevents fouling a little better.
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|