MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-15-2004, 03:20 AM   #1
mtv not bullets
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17
Default performance & mileage

I'm was looking at picking up some heads, roller rockers and an intake and all at once give my car a nice upgrade in power. However, this is my daily driver and I frequently have to drive pretty far. My concern is how badly different upgrades are going to hurt my fuel economy. I realize some mods are gas guzzlers (e.g. steep rear end) but a friend of mine suggested intake stuff may actually leave fuel economy almost stock. I'm open to other ideas of course as well. So my question is what performance upgrades can I do that leave fuel mileage alone - or, better yet - increase it?
mtv not bullets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2004, 11:15 PM   #2
moosejaw
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: St.Louis,MO
Posts: 274
Default

It is not unusual for an 89-93 5.0 to get 25+ MPH on the freeway. City driving is always going to be poor.

My car was at one time a 25+ car. It was before I bought it but it was a good performer. I know it had a 70mm TB, 1.7 rockers, Flowmaster cat-back, and gt-40 heads and intake. The stock cam was retained.

Now I can't be sure the heads and intake made the high mileage combo but the stock cam is the largest helper. Note that the gt-40 heads are not that aggressive. They have smaller valves and ports (than a standard performance head) and are good for mild power and good economy. The intake valves are 1.84" compared to 2.02" for the standard trickflow/afr/edelbrock etc.

Since you want a daily driver, you are correct the gears would not help much. You could leave off the 1.7 rockers and get more economy and extend valvetrain life.

Mike
__________________
Live near St.Louis?
Check out Mustang Muscle and Dyno in High Ridge, MO
moosejaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 05:29 PM   #3
Hethj7
Mizzou Tigers
 
Hethj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
Default

My car was a 25+ car also with the GT-40 heads and intake, B-cam, and other bolts ons. However, it has dropped off recently and I can't figure out why . I don't think my engine is getting tired or anything. I may have a bad sensor or something.

You can get pretty good mileage even with some add-ons to your car, although as stated before, city driving seems to always be poor.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT

1990 LX
GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved)

1998 Contour SVT

Rice Haters Club Member #244
Hethj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A few '92 GT Performance Mods Questions Fox Body Windsor Power 8 04-11-2003 06:19 AM
Performance shops in So Cal Kamaro Killer Windsor Power 7 09-14-2002 07:22 PM
performance of car continuing to fade away richie Windsor Power 3 08-21-2001 02:15 PM
WARNING ABOUT PERFORMANCE AUTOMATIC 84GT+NOS Modular Madness 1 09-15-2000 09:04 AM
WARNING ABOUT PERFORMANCE AUTOMATIC 84GT+NOS Classic Mustangs 0 09-14-2000 05:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.


SEARCH