
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 234
|
I have an older RPM intake(mabey 10 years old). Does anyone know if they have improved the design over the years? I would like to hear fromt people that have flow tested them ect.
I was thinking of getting the air gap intake, but they are pretty dear and it might not be worth it. Any suggestions. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mustangs
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
|
I don't think that there's been a dramatic change in those manifolds in the last 10 years. Air still flows the same it did 10 years ago
. If you have the intake and it was designed for the RPM range you want your engine to operate in, you might as well use it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 234
|
Geez I was just about to ttt it.
Yes I know air flows the same I was hoping some stickers would help the intake flow.Thanx. Anyone else? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fuelie intake question | ~The Jester~ | Windsor Power | 3 | 08-08-2004 02:24 PM |
| GT-40 lower intake question (small ports) | Dark_5.0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 01-28-2002 08:07 PM |
| SystemaxII intake and Box stock RPM heads | NewAge 5.0 | Windsor Power | 4 | 01-18-2002 12:52 AM |
| Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |
| Performer RPM vs. Track Heat which is better for my setup? | MY91GT | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-19-2001 12:52 PM |
