

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 168
|
![]() thinking serious about either heads (don't have the cash for the whole deal, cam, lifters, pushrods, roller rockers, etc) or intake/tb/maf combo. Will it be worth installing the ported GT40 irons with my stock 95 cam and maybe some 1.7rr's? or skip it now, and do the intake/tb/maf until I can get heads and a cam?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,575
|
![]() Get the heads! I had stock GT-40s on my car with headers,4.10 gear, 1.7's and factory intake and cam and it ran a 12.9@104, then I added the intake and cam and the rear end broke on the first pass so... The heads made a big differance over the E7's that were on there.
------------------ 87 GT, Cobra R's,GT-40 heads,Crane 2031,1.7's, Edelbrock intake, long tubes,BBK cold air, Mass air,pulleys,Pro 5.0, King Cobra,Lakewood Lift Bars,50/50's,subframes, 4.10's. Best time 12.759 Best MPH 106.79 Best 60' 1.695 Visit my site at: http://www.geocities.com/cobrar93_2000/MyPage.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: santa ana ca
Posts: 1,349
|
![]() Save your cash and get a set of aluminum heads. GT40's are better than E7's but just take a look at flow #'s between them and a set of AFR's or Twisted Wedges. They also weigh a LOT less which we heavy SN95's need. You can buy the little foo foo **** like TB and MAF later.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
News Editor
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,101
|
![]() Yes save your money. GT-40 heads suck, especially ported ones. Trust me. Go with an aluminum head.
------------------ 1994 Mustang Cobra 308ci, Vortech S-trim 11#, ported GT-40 heads, E-303 cam, FMS 1 5/8 headers, BBK Offroad H-pipe, 2-chamber flows, and several other goodies. Rebel Racing. Home of Bay Area Mustangs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Notorious One
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 51
|
![]() I'd go the AFR or TFS aluminum route. Don't worry about changing the cam yet, the stock cam will get you deep into the 12's.....and don't bother w/ the intake/tb/maf until you do the heads.
------------------ '90 5.0 LX - heads, intake, cam, fuel delivery, gears, full exhaust, pulleys, ignition, drag springs, front brake upgrade, a/c delete, K&N cone filter charger.......and much more! 1/4 mile: 12.29 @115 60': 1.78 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,575
|
![]() Thats funny, they really suck huh? Thats just why my car with them, out ran most cars with their expensive Alum. heads. GT-40 heads are a big improvement over factory heads, and for the price, it's just not worth the extra money for the little to none improvement. If you know what your doing, a good set of ported GT-40's will run with the best of them.
------------------ 87 GT, Cobra R's,GT-40 heads,Crane 2031,1.7's, Edelbrock intake, long tubes,BBK cold air, Mass air,pulleys,Pro 5.0, King Cobra,Lakewood Lift Bars,50/50's,subframes, 4.10's. Best time 12.759 Best MPH 106.79 Best 60' 1.695 Visit my site at: http://www.geocities.com/cobrar93_2000/MyPage.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
News Editor
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,101
|
![]() I dare you to do a dyno test from ported GT-40s against Twisted Wedge or AFR 165 heads. Then you'll how bad they suck.
Oh yeah ported GT-40's cause problems on blown cars. They don't give a consistent burn and some temperatures. ------------------ 1994 Mustang Cobra 308ci, Vortech S-trim 11#, ported GT-40 heads, E-303 cam, FMS 1 5/8 headers, BBK Offroad H-pipe, 2-chamber flows, and several other goodies. Rebel Racing. Home of Bay Area Mustangs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,575
|
![]() All, I'm saying is for the money you can't beat them. I had nothing but good results with mine. I only got one pass and it ran a 12.7 and the rearend broke. I think if I had it tuned and got some more runs in it would run an easy 12.2 or so, and half the people I see with high dollar motors aren't even running that. I know a few running around the same with GT-40's so they can't be all that bad.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Notorious One
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 51
|
![]() To buy Gt40's and then port them is a waste.....you'd be spending more $$$ than getting the TFS or AFR's out of the box anyway, just to get close to the same flow #'s. Just my .02
![]() ------------------ '90 5.0 LX - heads, intake, cam, fuel delivery, gears, full exhaust, pulleys, ignition, drag springs, front brake upgrade, a/c delete, K&N cone filter charger.......and much more! 1/4 mile: 12.29 @115 60': 1.78 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
improvements with ported stock heads | fiveohpatrol | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-24-2001 12:55 PM |
Ported Stock Intake HP??? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 13 | 03-22-2001 01:07 AM |
What to expect from ported stock lower? | jeb | Windsor Power | 1 | 03-19-2001 09:38 PM |
Ported Stock Heads... | FivepointOH | Windsor Power | 5 | 03-12-2001 03:47 PM |
LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers | jonnyk | Windsor Power | 9 | 01-01-2001 11:28 AM |