MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums

MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums (http://forums.mustangworks.com/index.php)
-   Windsor Power (http://forums.mustangworks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   MAF Choices?? (http://forums.mustangworks.com/showthread.php?t=43024)

GhOsT6_9 05-25-2004 07:19 PM

MAF Choices??
 
I'm lookin to upgrade my stock MAF to something bigger, but I don't know which company to go with.

I'm currently leaning towards the C&L 76mm w/inlet pipe kit.

Doesn't anyone know of any good or bad thing with these meters, or know of a meter that is better then this one??

Any info would be great.

RPM427 05-25-2004 09:26 PM

C&L worked great on my 91 GT.

LX5liter 05-29-2004 08:28 AM

Pro-M is good, but if you change injector sizes you have to have it re-calibrated instead of just buying a new sample tube. I've heard good and bad about both brands.

canukracer 05-29-2004 04:25 PM

I got the 76mm and inlet pipe works good so far! you use your old maf sensor in it so it's mostly the increased size and the tuned pipe:)

jonnyk 05-29-2004 04:55 PM

I went from the C&L 76 + inlet to a Pro-M Univer and noticed that it idles smoother now, but no changes otherwise. Both have been great to me.

95mustanggt 06-02-2004 11:56 AM

I have a Pro-M, car idles great, no complaints.

Capri306 06-03-2004 02:54 AM

I had a Pro-M meter, and it seemed to work very well both in the way the car performed and according to the infrared exhaust gas analyzer. :D But yes, you do have to have it recalibrated for different injector sizes, which ain't cheap if you continuously change injectors....but then again, if you change them that often, you more than likely have the bills to have it recalibrated, no?

FYI, the rumor mill said that the Pro-M's made more HP by having a slightly leaner ratio at the top end. Nothing to support those claims -- as I said, the analyzer said everything was okay -- but I've heard that from more than one person. Anyone else? :confused:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.