I need some help, i realize that some of you are tired of questions from new people..

ChesteR · 10-02-2001, 11:04 AM

But I am stuck between a 94 vert GT, and a 95 GTS (what is the GTS exactly, i cant see any obvious difference between that and the GT) The 94 Vert has 35K less miles but will obviously be more difficult to make fast... i am looking to go high 12's and daily driven, would Intake manifold, pullies, x pipe, cat back, headers, TB, MAF, CAI, timing, 3.73, and proper fuel be enough? Probably not? Do I need Explorer heads, and a cam? thanks for the advice.

89 Cobra LX · 10-02-2001, 11:29 AM

The GTS is a stripped down version of the GT. It was only made for a year and doesn't feature power windows or a spoiler (there are probably some other minor things that weren't available as well).

As far as which car to go with, it's really a question of what you're looking for. I'd go with the convertible, but that's because I've always wanted one. If you're more interested in performance, go with the GTS. With the mods you've listed you would be in the mid-13 second range. You would need a supercharger or a good set of aftermarket heads to get in the 12s.

------------------
Eric - 89 Mustang LX coupe
302 - Cobra Intake - GT40p heads - TFS stage 1 cam - FRPP 1.6 roller rockers - Naturally Aspirated
3:73 gears - KYB shocks and struts - Eibach springs - HPM Mega-bite Jr lower control arms - HPM upper control arms

GodStang · 10-02-2001, 12:18 PM

I agree with 89 cobra lx. I would go with the 94 cause it is the 30 yr mark of mustang and if they both have 5.0 in them than it will not be that much behind the GTS. The weight is not that much more. Only about 100-200lb i think. Just my $0.02. good luck with what ever you buy

mustang17 · 10-02-2001, 12:47 PM

The mods you have listed might be good for high 13's with great driving(for the GTS)but alot of SN95's still see low 14's.

To see high 12's with the vert is no easy task. You will need heads,intake,cam and all the rest. Even with the heads it's going to be tough to hit 12's.

I also don't think the Explorer heads are going to cut it on either car. I'd get the AFR 165's (I wish they had them when I did heads)from what I've seen they make a great street head. An aluminum head will save you 40 pounds also.

If you do heads and intake there is no reason why you wouldn't also put in a cam. A cam matched to the heads is very important.

I'd get the vert, less miles, more fun and a good challenge to get into the 12's.

Good luck!

------------------
1995 GT Black- Edelbrock 6037's,Intake,Edelbrock cam,70mm TB,75mm pro-m,Taylor wires, pulleys,Equal length headers,K&N filter
Flowmaster,3.73's, Eibach pro rate springs
lower control arms Centerforce clutch
New motor in the works!

10-02-2001, 01:12 PM

Personally, I'd stick w/ an 89-93 5.0, or if you're dead set on modulars, I'd choose either a newer Cobra or '00-'01 GT. If it's definetly a choice between these 2 or nothing, I'd go w/ the GTS (the verts too heavy and will take some extra $$$ to see the 12's). Also, the GTS will weigh a little less, cause it's a little "stripped down". Good luck w/ your choice.

------------------
'90 LX 5.0;12K original miles;FMS 3.55 gears; March pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads;BBK 1 5/8" equal length shorties;MSD 6AL ignition w/ blaster 2 coil;FMS E303 cam;Pro-M 75mm MAF;BBK 70mm TB; Eibach drag-launch spring kit;Southside weld-on subs;9" K&N cone filter charger;Hurst shifter;Cervini 3" turbo hood;A/C delete;gutted cats;2 chamber Flomasters;Corbeau racing seats;FMS 30# injectors;JMS custom chip;Holley 190lb fp;TFS track heat intake (12.299 @ 113mph w/ a 1.78 60')
....soon to be b

ChesteR · 10-02-2001, 01:34 PM

I dont remember saying anything about modulars...94/95 are both 5.0 if I remember correctly.

jetuomi · 10-02-2001, 02:51 PM

95 GTS, and put a spoiler on it !!!!
(SN-95's just don't look right without one!)

------------------
94 GT (triple black)
FMS 95 17" Cobra R's / AL Driveshaft / 3.27's
K&N, 12* timing, 180* thermostat, 190 lph
MAC Shifter/Gauges/Pedals, Euro Clear Projectors & Corners
My CAR!

5.0mgb!?! · 10-02-2001, 06:28 PM

Another thing to think about that hasn't been mentioned is you will need a roll bar for the convertible for both safety and chassis strength. I also agree there is nothing like a convertible!!!

10-02-2001, 11:04 AM	#1
ChesteR Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 7	I need some help, i realize that some of you are tired of questions from new people.. But I am stuck between a 94 vert GT, and a 95 GTS (what is the GTS exactly, i cant see any obvious difference between that and the GT) The 94 Vert has 35K less miles but will obviously be more difficult to make fast... i am looking to go high 12's and daily driven, would Intake manifold, pullies, x pipe, cat back, headers, TB, MAF, CAI, timing, 3.73, and proper fuel be enough? Probably not? Do I need Explorer heads, and a cam? thanks for the advice.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
speedy density to mass air questions	thdrcat	Windsor Power	3	09-25-2003 09:20 PM
This pretty much says how most people feel.	2FastLX	Blue Oval Lounge	43	09-17-2001 11:46 AM
Tired of Life and Things going WRONG!!	Mercury	Blue Oval Lounge	20	07-06-2001 03:27 AM
Tired of people Chickening out. Race Darnit.	Mercury	Stang Stories	6	04-07-2001 03:39 PM

10-02-2001, 11:29 AM	#2
89 Cobra LX Don Corlione Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Omaha NE USA Posts: 491	The GTS is a stripped down version of the GT. It was only made for a year and doesn't feature power windows or a spoiler (there are probably some other minor things that weren't available as well). As far as which car to go with, it's really a question of what you're looking for. I'd go with the convertible, but that's because I've always wanted one. If you're more interested in performance, go with the GTS. With the mods you've listed you would be in the mid-13 second range. You would need a supercharger or a good set of aftermarket heads to get in the 12s. ------------------ Eric - 89 Mustang LX coupe 302 - Cobra Intake - GT40p heads - TFS stage 1 cam - FRPP 1.6 roller rockers - Naturally Aspirated 3:73 gears - KYB shocks and struts - Eibach springs - HPM Mega-bite Jr lower control arms - HPM upper control arms

10-02-2001, 12:18 PM	#3
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	I agree with 89 cobra lx. I would go with the 94 cause it is the 30 yr mark of mustang and if they both have 5.0 in them than it will not be that much behind the GTS. The weight is not that much more. Only about 100-200lb i think. Just my $0.02. good luck with what ever you buy

10-02-2001, 12:47 PM	#4
mustang17 Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Concord, MA, USA Posts: 264	The mods you have listed might be good for high 13's with great driving(for the GTS)but alot of SN95's still see low 14's. To see high 12's with the vert is no easy task. You will need heads,intake,cam and all the rest. Even with the heads it's going to be tough to hit 12's. I also don't think the Explorer heads are going to cut it on either car. I'd get the AFR 165's (I wish they had them when I did heads)from what I've seen they make a great street head. An aluminum head will save you 40 pounds also. If you do heads and intake there is no reason why you wouldn't also put in a cam. A cam matched to the heads is very important. I'd get the vert, less miles, more fun and a good challenge to get into the 12's. Good luck! ------------------ 1995 GT Black- Edelbrock 6037's,Intake,Edelbrock cam,70mm TB,75mm pro-m,Taylor wires, pulleys,Equal length headers,K&N filter Flowmaster,3.73's, Eibach pro rate springs lower control arms Centerforce clutch New motor in the works!

10-02-2001, 01:12 PM	#5
bada$$lx Guest Posts: n/a	Personally, I'd stick w/ an 89-93 5.0, or if you're dead set on modulars, I'd choose either a newer Cobra or '00-'01 GT. If it's definetly a choice between these 2 or nothing, I'd go w/ the GTS (the verts too heavy and will take some extra $$$ to see the 12's). Also, the GTS will weigh a little less, cause it's a little "stripped down". Good luck w/ your choice. ------------------ '90 LX 5.0;12K original miles;FMS 3.55 gears; March pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads;BBK 1 5/8" equal length shorties;MSD 6AL ignition w/ blaster 2 coil;FMS E303 cam;Pro-M 75mm MAF;BBK 70mm TB; Eibach drag-launch spring kit;Southside weld-on subs;9" K&N cone filter charger;Hurst shifter;Cervini 3" turbo hood;A/C delete;gutted cats;2 chamber Flomasters;Corbeau racing seats;FMS 30# injectors;JMS custom chip;Holley 190lb fp;TFS track heat intake (12.299 @ 113mph w/ a 1.78 60') ....soon to be b

10-02-2001, 01:34 PM	#6
ChesteR Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 7	I dont remember saying anything about modulars...94/95 are both 5.0 if I remember correctly.

10-02-2001, 02:51 PM	#7
jetuomi Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada Posts: 214	95 GTS, and put a spoiler on it !!!! (SN-95's just don't look right without one!) ------------------ 94 GT (triple black) FMS 95 17" Cobra R's / AL Driveshaft / 3.27's K&N, 12* timing, 180* thermostat, 190 lph MAC Shifter/Gauges/Pedals, Euro Clear Projectors & Corners My CAR!

10-02-2001, 06:28 PM	#8
5.0mgb!?! Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Tx Posts: 8	Another thing to think about that hasn't been mentioned is you will need a roll bar for the convertible for both safety and chassis strength. I also agree there is nothing like a convertible!!!