MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-17-2001, 07:57 AM   #1
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post Ready to replace bearings and install cam......What's a good spec??

Well, it feels good to be back here! After all the time, energy and $$ I spent on my Stang I had to take some time off. Here's the situation. Me and my Uncle are yanking the engine out on 10/27 and having the bearings replaced. What I also want to do is get a more aggressive cam that is set to match my 3500 stall speed. The cam I have now is a custom grind from Comp Cams and is a close match to the emissions legal "E" cam from FRPP. That's how I passed emissions. Now that I'm clear from emissions testing for 2 years I figure I might as well get some more power from my 393. I know there is more HP to be found in there somewhere and short of porting the heads I think the cam would give me some serious HP if designed right. I have no ability to run a roller b/c I am not interested in buying the expensive conversion kit for a 5% HP gain. So, what do you guys think would be a good spec that would provide decent driveability with awesome power potential? I'm happy with what I have now but after subscribing to MM&FF and 5.0 for a year I know that there is more power to be found with a good cam on the larger cube engines.

------------------
Just need the sticker!

Red 1993 GT
1969 351 block w/393 stroker. Edlebrock Performer heads and Performer RPM EFI, FRPP 30lb injectors & Cartech fuel system. JMS chip & MSD ignition.
Dynamic Roller Myte C4, 8 pt cage, Sothside Machine bars & Sub-frames, adj. upper's, 3.73's, Koni rear shocks
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 08:19 AM   #2
ALS85GT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Miami, Fl, USA
Posts: 69
Wink

the cam choice would also depend on how you would like your idle and possible the vacume avail for power brakes. As an example, I have a 5.0 using a 498"lift Exh, & 220"duration. It idles a bit lumpy which is fine w/me. For a larger displacement engine like yours I would go higher, say 520" by 236". This would give you noticable power but w/a lumpy idle. my 2 cents....
ALS85GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 11:25 AM   #3
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

I would actually like a lumpier idle, it sounds great and would fit with the look of the car. As far as the brakes go, I'll sacrafice it for the the extra power. It's all about respecting the streets The seat of the pants HP and torque is what I like.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ALS85GT:
[B]the cam choice would also depend on how you would like your idle and possible the vacume avail for power brakes.
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 12:14 PM   #4
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

Hey man, how ya doin? I thought we lost you. What's the compression your running (pistons), and what size MAF do you have?

As far as the brakes, an auxilary vacuum can will help.

~Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop

My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 01:56 PM   #5
ALS85GT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Miami, Fl, USA
Posts: 69
Talking

Most cam/perf parts retailers will listen to what you are looking for and help you choose the right cam. I would get a few opinions before deciding. But I can't help but love the sound and feel of a beefy cam in a V-8.
ALS85GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 03:41 PM   #6
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

Hey Buddy!
How the hell are ya? I've been o.k. I've been real busy with work, school, trying to find a good Winter vehicle and raising my daughter and etc. I'll never be lost, just real frustrated if I have this bearing problem again. To answer your question, I'm running 10.5/1 Compression and my MAF is 75MM. Nice to hear from you!


Quote:
Originally posted by PKRWUD:
Hey man, how ya doin? I thought we lost you. What's the compression your running (pistons), and what size MAF do you have?

As far as the brakes, an auxilary vacuum can will help.

~Chris

Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2001, 10:12 PM   #7
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

Listen... Do you hear it? The Comp Cams #32-225-4 is calling your name.

Take care,
~Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop

My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2001, 06:48 AM   #8
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

I can hear it She sounds real lumpy and when I punch it...oh yeah!! Do you know what the specs are??
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2001, 09:34 AM   #9
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

Comp Cams #32-225-4:

Magnum Hydraulic
Operating range: 2000 - 6000 rpm
Duration (@.050") 230/230
Lift: .530/.530
Lobe sep angle: 110 degrees

"Good in street machines, mild conv., headers and gears. 9:1 - 10:1 comp. Rough idle."

It's significantly bigger than the one it's replacing, but still quite drivable.

Something just occured to me... Is your block a 351C or a 351W?



------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop

My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2001, 12:09 PM   #10
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

I have a '69 Windsor block (C casting I believe). When I get home I'll check my cam spec card and I'll get back to you with my current #'s.

Quote:
Originally posted by PKRWUD:
Comp Cams #32-225-4:

Magnum Hydraulic
Operating range: 2000 - 6000 rpm
Duration (@.050") 230/230
Lift: .530/.530
Lobe sep angle: 110 degrees

"Good in street machines, mild conv., headers and gears. 9:1 - 10:1 comp. Rough idle."

It's significantly bigger than the one it's replacing, but still quite drivable.

Something just occured to me... Is your block a 351C or a 351W?

Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2001, 12:50 PM   #11
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

That cam is for a 351C block. Post your current specs, and I'll find you a winner.

~C

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop

My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2001, 11:26 PM   #12
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

Try this instead:

Comp Cams #35-330-3
2500-6500
244/244
.518/.518
110*
"Great street/stripcam. 10:1 compression, headers, intake, gears and 3000 stall. Very rough idle"

Take care,
-Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop

My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2001, 07:38 PM   #13
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

Here's what I'm using.

Comp Cams #35-000-5
2500-5500
224/231
.508/.513
112*

Chris- How much HP can you expect to gain from a cam swap?
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 04:52 AM   #14
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

That's a tough question. i would estimate a 25 hp increase with the cam I suggested, but more importantly, it will extend your range, giving you a wider powerband.

Take care,
-Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop



My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 03:38 PM   #15
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

I need your opinion Chris. Right now my combo is mis-matched. I have a cam that's designed for a 2500 stall speed and my converter locks at 3500. If it were your car would you get a larger can to match the torque convertor (less $$), or try to get Dynamic Racing to either replace or give me another stall convertor set at 2500 to match my current cam design (either way more $$than a cam swap)?
My engine builder and some buddies think that I should get the smaller torque convertor (for driveability purposes on the street) but I want to your opinion. I guess I need to know what a better combo would be for my Edelbrock street legal unported/unpolished heads and intake. At this point all hopes are lost for a timeslip this season as the drag strip closes this Sunday. That sucks but now I can concentrate on next year and finishing everything the right way rather than rushing. I still need to get my hood and extra spoiler painted Thanks again!
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 04:11 PM   #16
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Post

Quote:
My engine builder and some buddies think that I should get the smaller torque convertor (for driveability purposes on the street) but I want to your opinion.
FYI- A smaller torque convertor has a higher stall speed. A bigger torque convertor has a lower stall speed.

If this was your daily driver and grocery getter, I would say go with a lower stall convertor, then smack you for putting so much into a daily driver. But, if this is your "play" car, your "Weekend Warrior", then I would go with the cam I suggested above. It will still be driveable on the street, but it will scream on the track. I feel that with the new cam, you will be getting the most out of the work you have already done. There's not a huge difference between the cams, just enough to feed what you've already got. It will idle a bit rougher, but so what? Just don't set any beverages on the hood.

Take care,
-Chris

------------------
Retired Moderator
MustangNet

My site: Peckerwoods Pit Stop



My teams site: Jim Porter Racing

RACECAR spelled backwards is RACECAR

HEY !!! Are you ASE Certified ??? If you are, ask me about iATN.

[This message has been edited by PKRWUD (edited 10-23-2001).]
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 07:33 PM   #17
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

A smaller stall speed is what I meant, sorry. That's what I get for posting msg's while at work

That's what I needed to hear. A larger cam would help and I don't think it'll take very long to reach that 3500 stall. I took her out for a ride tonight (probably the first in over 3 weeks) and it was nice and cool. Man she's got some power...Wow. All I can say is I had an ear to ear smile that lasted way after I got out of the car. Thanks again for all the help. I can't wait for next season....have you had any experience with those dashboard analyzers? My buddy is getting one and he told me I could use it. He said they are accurate to within .2 of a second.

Also, what do you think about a "powerpipe"? I'm running that BBK 65mm Cold Air kit in the fendewell but I noticed the 70??MM "powerpipe" isn't in the fender. How do they figure that hot engine air produces power? I never understood that concept.
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.


SEARCH