© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-09-2001, 12:05 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stony Brook, NY
Posts: 13
|
HELP! Newbie 95-96 GT questions
Potential first time Mustang owner with some pre-purchase questions. I am not that familiar with the Mustang and have some basic questions between the 95 pushrod and 96 4.6 cars. I do not intend to do a great deal of modification to the car I buy.
So, with that said, is either engine more preferable from a long life or ease of modification point of view? I would assume the 95 car would be cheaper to modify because it has been around longer, but the 4.6 has been around now for some time as well, although much less time. Second, is there any reason why a 96-97 car might be preferable over a 95 as far as equipment or some other reason, or aside from the engine are they really the same? Thanks, Ron Brooks |
07-09-2001, 12:13 PM | #2 |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Get the 95, the 5.0 is faster and cheaper to work on.
------------------ 1990 Dodge Dynasty with 275,000 miles. Mods:chiped paint, CD player. Sucks but it was free. Praying for a stang. The "Guetto Glider" If it ain't broke, you ain't tryin hard enough |
07-09-2001, 01:21 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
I have a 95. It is great. Stock I think that they have more bottom end power and therefore are a little more fun to drive without mods. Should you decide to mod your car, there are a billion cheap aftermarket parts out there.
That being said, I don't want to take anything away from the 96-98 4.6L's. They are nice cars, and can run strong. It is just that they require a fair bit more cash to hotrod. I recommend that you drive both (if you can). Pick the car that suits your budget, driving style, and future plans. Hope that helps. Oh and one more thing, I LOVE the dash clock on the 95. It was removed in the 4.6L cars. ------------------ 1995 Mustang GT |
07-09-2001, 02:25 PM | #4 |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
the 96-98 has conciderably less power, as it was before ford understood how to use the smaller 4.6l. with the newer heads, its just fine. if you want more power, get a 94-95, i like their body better too.
|
07-09-2001, 03:16 PM | #5 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
Let me add to the chorus for the '95 Mustang.
Not only cheaper to buy, but as stated in prior posts, the trusty 5.0 engine is a very good piece in stock form and very responsive to mods, which are plentiful and reasonable, should you want to go that route. The later models have some nice features (interiors are improved, as is suspension) and the 4.6 is O.K., but simply not up to the performance of the 5.0. 4.6 parts are also generally more expensive. |
07-09-2001, 04:13 PM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
Plus the '95's have the cool dash clock! |
|
07-09-2001, 06:09 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: santa ana ca
Posts: 1,349
|
95 5.0
------------------ 95GT B303 cam, 1.7 rockers, 65mm TB, milled heads, 355's K&N, BBK Longtubes, Flowmaster cat back, pulleys, msd coil, 9mm wires, Tremec 3550, Pro5.0 shifter,10.5 Motorsport clutch, FMS aluminum driveshaft, weld in subframe connectors |
07-11-2001, 07:38 PM | #8 |
Buford T Justice
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Pennsylvania 5.0 in a 5.0
Posts: 67
|
Definitely the 95...stock has much more torque than a stock 96-98 4.6
------------------ In Memory of Dale Earnhardt 1951-2001 Deep forest green '95 Mustang GTS, Edelbrock Upper & Lower Intake, FMS 3:73's, B&M Ripper 5-speed, air silencer removed, K&N filter, advanced timing, 2 chamber Flowmasters, 2000 Mustang GT wheels, Indiglo whiteface gauges, and lots of wishing I had the money for more. 1989 Ford Bronco 4X4 Eddie Bauer Edition 351 stock except K&N filter, currently has a blown rear end. <A HREF="http://www.aliquippaoutlaws.com" TARGET=_blank>Aliquipp |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
A few '92 GT Performance Mods Questions | Fox Body | Windsor Power | 8 | 04-11-2003 06:19 AM |
New GT - Wanted a Piece of ME | NO SLO PK | Stang Stories | 13 | 11-28-2002 12:35 PM |
Is it possible to pass a 96-98 4.6 gt engine off as a cobra somehow?read! | 96_4.6 | Modular Madness | 20 | 11-24-2002 10:20 PM |
GT and LS-1 get into Tangle. GT WINS!! | Mercury | Stang Stories | 8 | 06-26-2001 12:49 PM |