MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

86GT · 12-23-2001, 11:17 AM

Thanks for the replies so far! I guess I should have done this with a poll too, oh well. I ruled out the F-303 cam, so its either the 51014 (that's what I'm told it is) and the TFS Stage 1. For comparison sake, I put the cam specs into the desktop dyno 2000 (yeah I know, computers may not be that accurate). I put in all the proper flow numbers for his heads, and really the only thing I can see is that the TFS cam makes slightly more power at a lower rpm over the Lunati. The torque curves seem the same. Keep in mind I only ran it on that program just to see if there's a difference. He's gonna get which ever cam on the day after Christmas.

12-23-2001, 11:17 AM	#6
86GT Sniffed too much n20 Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Ont, Canada Posts: 1,018	Thanks for the replies so far! I guess I should have done this with a poll too, oh well. I ruled out the F-303 cam, so its either the 51014 (that's what I'm told it is) and the TFS Stage 1. For comparison sake, I put the cam specs into the desktop dyno 2000 (yeah I know, computers may not be that accurate). I put in all the proper flow numbers for his heads, and really the only thing I can see is that the TFS cam makes slightly more power at a lower rpm over the Lunati. The torque curves seem the same. Keep in mind I only ran it on that program just to see if there's a difference. He's gonna get which ever cam on the day after Christmas.