Thread: 1/4 mile times
View Single Post
Old 02-17-2003, 02:12 AM   #20
Killercanary
Registered Member
 
Killercanary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Altoona, PA
Posts: 336
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Stang_Crazy
This post became counter productive a long time ago. Leave the ego's at the door. This isn't a pissing contest.

Its not a pissing contest, its just we're stepping up to make sure bad info isn't spead. It only takes one post like that claiming a stock 94-95 will go 100mph stock then every newbie that reads it will either start claiming that's what their cars runs, or will go to thr track and see that they do in fact only trap mid-low 90's and think something is wrong with their car. I think its obvious that if the fox bodied coupe guys that replied here aren't running 100mph stock, a heavier SN95 sure isn't going to do it. Like I said before, I didn't mean to take this post off topic, but when information is THAT bad, it has to be corrected. If he posted that he ran 100mph in any 94-95 specific forum he'd get flamed right off the board. You know, things are always possible, but this one is just a bit beyond that relm of possibility. BUT it is possible with a 60' that bad that wheel spin had a factor in inflating the trap speed, and that coupled with a possible miscalibrated track could explain why he thinks a stock 94-95 will run 100mph stock, but the truth remains they can not.

BTW- I race at keystone (now pittsburgh raceway park) every week... you ever go?
__________________
-Paul
Dec '04 5.0 Mustang and Super Fords Magazine Featured Car

1995 NA GT CONVERTIBLE
BEST PASS TO DATE: 12.19 at 112.51
AFR's, FTI cam, edelbrock intake, EEC TUNER and all the bolt ons on the stock shortblock.

http://www.angelfire.com/pa2/killercanary
Killercanary is offline   Reply With Quote