Quote:
Originally posted by T5superduty
Sorry guys I didnt dyno my car "if you cared anyway" but here is another very interesting thing to look at and too consider what mine could really be making now. Now you will see that I have better compression, better carb, better heads,better headers, better intake, mabye less% drop from my manual, but not a better cam. Could my combo come out to be better or worse than what his is. What do you all think ?This is a person on another forum who just got his car dynod the results were:
RPM HP TORQUE
3500 145 217.58
4000 190 249.47
4500 235 274.27
5000 255 267.85
5500 270 257.82
6000 280 245.09
6500 290 234.32
All values are “Read Wheel Values”
Engine;
1990 5.0-HO Bottom end with 8.5:1 flat tops, Ford Racing X-303 Cam, Ford Racing Y-303 Heads with Crane Gold 1.6 rockers, Performer RPM and a 1406-600 CFM Carb, Doug Thorly “Try-Y” headers into a full flow “X” crossover straight pipe exhaust using only 12" glass packs.
Transmission;
1966 Costume Built C-4 with an 10” “Edge Racing “ 2600 rpm stall torque converter.
|
Well, you know you can have the exact same stuff as someone else and still be way off his/her combo when it comes to power.
As goes for this guys combo,
. It doesn't make any sense!!!!! 8.5 to 1 compression w/ an X-cam!!!!! And a 2600 stall converter??????And oh yea,....glass packs..haaaaaaaaa, come on
What did he do, put his combo together at Pep Boys. Look those numbers seem fabricated, if it truly made those numbers (BS
) then he made it, inspite of it not because of it!
By the way your combo as a whole is 100 times better then his!!
Just get your dynoed or go to the track when you are able too.
That's my two cents......glass packs ha-ha-ha---holy shyte---haa haa. damb!!