

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ORANGE PARK FL. USA
Posts: 208
|
![]() I was going to goto a Performer RPM and port it. The Victor EFI intake is just too much for a N/A 302. Will this new RPM II intake kinda be in between the RPM and the Victor?? If it is then ill be waiting to buy an intake untill the new one comes out.
![]()
__________________
91 LX COUPE, 3.73 gears, 2 1/2 inch H-Pipe, 1 5/8 MAC long tube headers, 73 MM C&L MAF, 70 MM MAC TB, LUNATI cam,1.7 TFS Rockers, TFS Track Heat heads, TFS Track Heat intake, T5 with PRO 5.0 shifter, Griffin aluminum radiator, Fluid Damper, SSM traction bars, 190 GPH in tank fuel pump. And more to come. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 220
|
![]() yea...ive been in the same boat...debating on the systemax or waiting til the RPM 2 comes out
__________________
90 LX Hatchback 306, AFR 165's 58cc, E303, 1.6 roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, cobra intake, bbk fenderwell, bbk longtubes, x-pipe, flowmasters, pullies, msd 6a, crane ps-92, stock MAF sensor, electric fan, No AC, No air pump, flaming river quick ratio rack C-4, 3500 stall, 373's, aluminum driveshaft SSM Lift bars, , sub frame connectors, strut tower brace 12.57 @105.12mph w/ 1.686 60ft before bbk longtubes (with equal shorties) ----------------------------------------- 86 tube chassis coupe - the trailor queen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 100
|
![]() I would say it is between the two. It flows a little more on the top end than the Performer RPM. The new issue of 5.0 has an article about it.
Murdock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2 Stangs in the Stable
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 1,209
|
![]() I read that article and am really considering getting that intake. It seems to be a well rounded intake. The only setback is they did away with the removeable plenum cover that they are famous for, sort of. It is there, but smaller and on the under side of the plenum. But man it looks nice. Almost looks identical to the systemax (or trick flow I cant remember) intakes.
To actually answer your question, they opened up the throttle opening and gave it a v shape between the throttle opening and the runners on the bottom side to even out the velocity of the incoming air. They also ported the lower intake runners to accomodate for the extra flow generated with the new design of the upper. The reason for the changes was to increase top end and try not to sacrifice any low end. Caymon
__________________
'90 GT Under construction Best E.T. = Fast @ High Speeds - OK So I Lie. So What!!! ![]() ![]() 04 F-150 STX 4.2L 5 spd Rice Haters Club Member #128 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Performer RPM vs RPM Air Gap | Phantom5oh | Windsor Power | 17 | 01-10-2002 04:19 PM |
Performer RPM carbed intake question? | shovelnose | Windsor Power | 2 | 09-24-2001 11:42 PM |
Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |