MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-17-2003, 11:34 AM   #1
5ohCOUPE
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ORANGE PARK FL. USA
Posts: 208
Default Performer RPM II Question.

I was going to goto a Performer RPM and port it. The Victor EFI intake is just too much for a N/A 302. Will this new RPM II intake kinda be in between the RPM and the Victor?? If it is then ill be waiting to buy an intake untill the new one comes out.
__________________
91 LX COUPE, 3.73 gears, 2 1/2 inch H-Pipe, 1 5/8 MAC long tube headers, 73 MM C&L MAF, 70 MM MAC TB, LUNATI cam,1.7 TFS Rockers, TFS Track Heat heads, TFS Track Heat intake, T5 with PRO 5.0 shifter, Griffin aluminum radiator, Fluid Damper, SSM traction bars, 190 GPH in tank fuel pump. And more to come.
5ohCOUPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2003, 08:24 PM   #2
dragstang86
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 220
Default

yea...ive been in the same boat...debating on the systemax or waiting til the RPM 2 comes out
__________________
90 LX Hatchback
306, AFR 165's 58cc, E303, 1.6 roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, cobra intake, bbk fenderwell, bbk longtubes, x-pipe, flowmasters, pullies, msd 6a, crane ps-92, stock MAF sensor, electric fan, No AC, No air pump, flaming river quick ratio rack


C-4, 3500 stall, 373's, aluminum driveshaft

SSM Lift bars, , sub frame connectors, strut tower brace


12.57 @105.12mph w/ 1.686 60ft before bbk longtubes (with equal shorties)
-----------------------------------------
86 tube chassis coupe - the trailor queen
dragstang86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2003, 06:54 AM   #3
Murdock
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 100
Default

I would say it is between the two. It flows a little more on the top end than the Performer RPM. The new issue of 5.0 has an article about it.

Murdock
__________________
LARZRACECARS
larzracecars.com
Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2003, 06:00 PM   #4
bigred90gt
2 Stangs in the Stable
 
bigred90gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 1,209
Default

I read that article and am really considering getting that intake. It seems to be a well rounded intake. The only setback is they did away with the removeable plenum cover that they are famous for, sort of. It is there, but smaller and on the under side of the plenum. But man it looks nice. Almost looks identical to the systemax (or trick flow I cant remember) intakes.

To actually answer your question, they opened up the throttle opening and gave it a v shape between the throttle opening and the runners on the bottom side to even out the velocity of the incoming air. They also ported the lower intake runners to accomodate for the extra flow generated with the new design of the upper. The reason for the changes was to increase top end and try not to sacrifice any low end.

Caymon
__________________
'90 GT Under construction
Best E.T. = Fast @ High Speeds - OK So I Lie. So What!!!
04 F-150 STX 4.2L 5 spd
Rice Haters Club Member #128
bigred90gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM Engines BLOCKER Blue Oval Lounge 2 04-13-2004 12:35 AM
Speed Secret # 3 jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 13 11-09-2002 10:35 AM
Performer RPM vs RPM Air Gap Phantom5oh Windsor Power 17 01-10-2002 04:19 PM
Performer RPM carbed intake question? shovelnose Windsor Power 2 09-24-2001 11:42 PM
Performer VS. Performer RPM IMPULSERACING Windsor Power 8 02-09-2001 12:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.


SEARCH