![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 121
|
![]() Has anybody ran both and noticed any difference between the 2? What where the differences? Thanks.
-Dave ------------------ 1988 GT-under construction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
|
![]() Good question I've ran more than a coupla Edelbrocks and one or two Weiands. Never a stealth though. Always liked Edelbrocks manifold stuff. However to be honest all of their Performer and Performer RPM stuff is geared toward the street (as in mild combo's making like 400 hp with lots of torque) and then you have the race pieces which are at the other end of spectrum completely (Vic 5.0 intake and Vic race heads) they don't seem to have a middle ground despite the Performer, Performer RPM and Victor lines?. On an EFI intake things might be better because its easier to port the manifolds versus a dual plane 180 deg unit like the Performer RPM?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Performer RPM vs RPM Air Gap | Phantom5oh | Windsor Power | 17 | 01-10-2002 04:19 PM |
PERFORMER RPM OR GT 40 | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-23-2001 09:22 PM |
Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |