

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
![]() Up until the 1980s, the 351W was considered inferior to the 351C, since the Cleveland had better flowing heads and a racing heritage. But nowadays, there's a huge availability of performance heads, cams, intakes, and headers for the Windsor. I also agree, it's cheaper to build a Windsor.
Given the availability of parts for the Windsor, it just doesn't make sense to stay with the old school thinking of running a Cleveland. You can tell your dad I said that, and tell 'em I've owned both engines ![]() ------------------ Russ L '91 LX Procharger, 3 row intercooler, extrude honed Cobra intake, Mac full Length Headers, 30# inj., 73mm C&L, 75mm tb, E303 cam, 289 rods, ported E7 heads, MSD, T-Rex w/255 lph Walbro, 5 lug conversion, Cobra R wheels, 3.27 gears and Moser Axles. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351C vs 351W | stvneil | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-29-2004 10:25 AM |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM |
HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker | stroker393 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-09-2001 10:24 AM |
351W vs 351C | Five0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-26-2001 08:18 PM |