Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
06-21-2001, 11:19 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
|
Found out the answer to my own question by calling FRPP. The guy told me that as long as it is a balanced rotating assembly, I won't have any problems. He also added that there is a good and bad way to balance rotating assemblies. The good way is to remove any necessary weight from the crank, not the flywheel or damper. The bad way is vice versa. I feel much better now. Now if I could only find a timing pointer I'd be all set.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351W Heads on a 87 302 Block | NitroNixon | Windsor Power | 5 | 05-08-2003 09:29 PM |
| 351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
| 351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
| 351W in a Fox body | greydan | Windsor Power | 4 | 07-03-2002 02:33 PM |
| HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker | stroker393 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-09-2001 10:24 AM |