

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() If you can get the GT-40 for cheaper than the Edelbrock then do it. Both intakes will work great with those heads. The edelbrocks upper can be modified whereas the GT-40's can't but the GT-40 upper flows really well and there's more airflow potential to be found in porting the lower anyways. I'd say get what you can get the better deal on (of the two).
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Typhoon Intake vs Edelbrock Performer RPM | lucheski | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-13-2004 12:54 PM |
RPM performer heads w/2.02 intake valves ? | leathal injection | Windsor Power | 3 | 06-07-2004 11:53 AM |
Heads, intake.......AND BEYOND! | dinomite | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-29-2001 04:24 PM |
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |
Cobra or Trick Flow intake with GT40P heads? | Shotgun28 | Windsor Power | 16 | 01-24-2001 04:15 PM |