MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-07-2003, 06:49 AM   #1
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Cool Corrected for sea level / Bull?

I always bothers me to see this in the mags, here, ect... I just don't believe it. Why is it that if you watch NHRA, no matter where they are, the cars always run VERY close to what they ran at a totaly differant track, cross the country, in the mountains, in the vally, ect...

To me this is like a ricer saying, Yea it runs 12s, but....and it is a 15 sec car. I mean really, if a dyno shows 400hp in NY, bing the car to La. and it will show 452hp? I don't buy it.

Help me understand or is this really just bull.
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 12:54 PM   #2
Murdock
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 100
Default

At each NHRA track the ET is automatically corrected for each run. The timing computer takes the correction factor into account when it displays the ET on the board. So if your watching on TV or at the race you would never see it, but it is there.

Murdock
__________________
LARZRACECARS
larzracecars.com
Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 01:24 PM   #3
5ohCOUPE
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ORANGE PARK FL. USA
Posts: 208
Default

uuuhhhh
__________________
91 LX COUPE, 3.73 gears, 2 1/2 inch H-Pipe, 1 5/8 MAC long tube headers, 73 MM C&L MAF, 70 MM MAC TB, LUNATI cam,1.7 TFS Rockers, TFS Track Heat heads, TFS Track Heat intake, T5 with PRO 5.0 shifter, Griffin aluminum radiator, Fluid Damper, SSM traction bars, 190 GPH in tank fuel pump. And more to come.
5ohCOUPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 01:37 PM   #4
WADS56
gear banger
 
WADS56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
Default

Not to mention a top fuel car and it's nitro mix will change from track to track, and barometric(sp) pressure. They can get more agressive with the fuel in a more elevateed area.
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor
93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe
Ricer hater's club member #49
WADS56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 02:11 PM   #5
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default

Street cars are affected a lot more than faster cars as well. The two track I run at are one at sea level and one at 1700ft. I've ran 104mph at the sea level track and 99 mph on a really hot weekend (100*F) and dry as a wick (4000ft corrected altitude). So altitude does affect a street car a lot.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 03:12 PM   #6
Simi Stang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default altitude correction not bull

No it's not bull. Haven't you ever been skiing up in the mountains where you climb at least 2000'-6000'ft. during the drive up the hill? The car/truck you are driving will feel SOOO much slower. Way down on power. My foreman is getting ready to move to Colorado. I forgot which city, but it's up at like 8 or 9000'. They already bought the house up there and his wife has made the move. His wife's Honda SUV felt so much slower that she thought something was wrong with it! She was almost thinking about taking it into a shop. Haven't you ever seen guys from Colorado post their times from a track that is at 4000' or 5000'? There times are always real slow compared to times others turn with similar mods down at 1000' or lower track. I run my Mustang at a track that is at 2700' above sea level. I've also ran my car at a track that is no longer around (Terminal Island, Brotherhood Raceway) that was right at sea level, basically on a man made island just several feet above the ocean water. I never made it there with my new motor. But on my stock motor with all of the normal bolt ons & 3.55 gears I was turning 14.2s on street radials. Same setup at the track in the high desert (2700') netted me several 14.7s. So yes, there is a difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 03:15 PM   #7
Simi Stang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default altitude correction link

Here is a link to the website of the track I race at. Scroll down towards the bottom and you'll see their formula for the correction. http://lacr.net/indexmain.htm
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2003, 10:16 PM   #8
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Cool

I bow my head, turn my backside, and allow the trashes to start.
owch
oooh
ouchhh
stopp
stopp
arrgg
owww
it hurts
stop please

I love you guys, thanks for the info. In my sig it says young and stupid, I must have leaned over to the stupid side. I'll be OK for a while.
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2003, 01:18 AM   #9
gtsr515
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
Default One of my ?'s too.....

In my opinion the reason sea level effects our cars so much, but NOT the NHRA guy's is the NHRA guy's have a BILLION horsepower, they can run what they want, where they want, for Top Fuel cars, the BIGGEST concern no matter where they go is how the CLUTCH is set-up, sometimes you'll hear them say.."We're gonna turn her up a notch.....well, it's not the motor that gets turned up.....it's the clutch.........

Am I way off???

The local track I used to race at (Byron, Illinois), Heck!...that track was downhill big time...I mean obviously, and NO MATTER WHAT, I always ran quicker at Great Lakes Dragway (Wisconsin) and that track is straight as a string???????????

HHHHHmmmmmmmmmmm.......great topic 88 workcar!!!!!!!!!!!

Jay
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers!
gtsr515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2003, 01:29 AM   #10
Technick
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
Default

The other thing that Top Fuel cars can do is spin the supercharger faster to make up for the difference of the thin air. The Pro Stock guy's run 1/2 sec slower at Denver than they do anywhere else, because they are naturally asperated (no power adder) Now you can take your 7,000 foot e.t. and correct for altitude and you will have an idea of how fast your car WOULD/SHOULD run at sea level!
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!!
Technick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2003, 02:30 AM   #11
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Elevation makes a huge difference Odessa is 3000ft above sea level. I know people that have ran ther car at a sea level track after running here and ran 5 tenths faster.

Over here.

Ls-1's almost never hit 13's stock
99+ GT's run mid 14's at best
96-97 GT's often run in the 16's

I envy you people that get to race at sea level.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2003, 03:17 PM   #12
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default

The first time I raced at altitude I thought the track was too short because my 3-4 shift didn't come until about 20 ft from the finish line! My 3-4 shift at sea level was at about the 1000ft mark. My friends 99GT didn't even have to get out of 3rd at the top end.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2003, 10:25 PM   #13
drtbiker
Registered Member
 
drtbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mt. Prospect,IL
Posts: 474
Default

yeah tell me about byron, how can u even race there, funny story is my buddy lost 3 tenths with his focus when he raced there vs greatlakes.... he ran like 15.30+@ greatlakes and 15 flat at byron


sorry about that it is a little off the topic but what the h*ll how can that be far to even say u ran a time when u didnt

later
__________________
87-ford-mustang-SOLD!
mods: 3:73's, off road h-pipe, b303 cam in gt- 40 motor w/ Power Plus intake, edelbrock 70mm tb & egr spacer, 72mm C&L, bbk long tubes, tremec tranny, centerforce dual friction clutch, upr and lwr CA's 255lph FP and soon more to come.... when i have money again

SOME ADVICE
Don't do burn outs in reverse it is very expensive
New times with dead hook on dr's 13.27@103 with 2.0 60 foots w/100lb system

Fastest time to date: 12.8@113
drtbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2003, 10:56 PM   #14
Shaggy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 466
Default

My expierence is Yes elevation can effect et big time but on the flip side using the conversion formula to correct it to sea level is about as accurate as calculating you ET and MPH off of your 1/8 mile time. It will give you a general idea of what you would run but it is not a truely exact science because all acrs respond a little different to the elevation just like not all cars accelerate the same between the first 1/8 to the second 1/8.. a good example is my falcon it runs a 13.29 1/4 @ 100.00 but if you take my 1/8 8.43 @ 82.34 I should have run a 13.15 @ 103 according to the analyzer here(which is closer then when i do the math on the street because i just use the old stand by of multiplying it by 1.5 in my head). I wish my car could MPH 103 the best if has ever done is 100.15 and it has only broke 3 digits about 4 times the rest of the time it is a solid 99 MPH car. Anyway back to the point It is close but not perfect.
__________________
A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week.
George S. Patton, General (1885-1945)
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2003, 11:11 PM   #15
dragstang86
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 220
Default

Like mentioned above...a street car is going to be affected more than a higher hp car. For example a high compression engine isnt affected as much by weather changes as a lower compression engine. A low compression engine may run 4-5 tenths faster on a cool november day than a hot summer day where a high compression engine may only run 2 tenths faster in november than it did in july.
__________________
90 LX Hatchback
306, AFR 165's 58cc, E303, 1.6 roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, cobra intake, bbk fenderwell, bbk longtubes, x-pipe, flowmasters, pullies, msd 6a, crane ps-92, stock MAF sensor, electric fan, No AC, No air pump, flaming river quick ratio rack


C-4, 3500 stall, 373's, aluminum driveshaft

SSM Lift bars, , sub frame connectors, strut tower brace


12.57 @105.12mph w/ 1.686 60ft before bbk longtubes (with equal shorties)
-----------------------------------------
86 tube chassis coupe - the trailor queen
dragstang86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel LEVEL gauge??? Mustangbelle306 Windsor Power 5 03-27-2002 09:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.


SEARCH