

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() here's the dilemma, i have a 92 ranger longbed with a bed that i have come to call custom flareside (incident with pole on one side and a car on the other
![]() ![]() ------------------ 88 Notchback 5.0, 3.73's, pulleys, BBK headers, off-road H-pipe, flowmasters, subframe connectors, 65mm TB, shift kit, March ram air kit, motorsport wires, MSD coil, upper and lower control arms, 155lph fuel pump, cheap 2800 stall, Crane Adj.FPR, best time- 13.99@99.75, not yet tested times after 1.7RR install ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() anyone have any idea or atleast some insight on it?
------------------ 88 Notchback 5.0, 3.73's, pulleys, BBK headers, off-road H-pipe, flowmasters, subframe connectors, 65mm TB, shift kit, March ram air kit, motorsport wires, MSD coil, upper and lower control arms, 155lph fuel pump, cheap 2800 stall, Crane Adj.FPR, best time- 13.99@99.75, not yet tested times after 1.7RR install ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() ttt
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() hey i know a guy that did this swap let me talk to him tom. i will get you the details, by the way your car looks bad *** in the pic.
Ted |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,511
|
![]() Well I would think they'd be the same but the ranger frame does come in different wheel base lengths. Not sure if it did that year but I know the new ones do. I know the explorer(ranger frame) has a shorter wheel base in the 2 door version than the 4 door version. So you would think an extended cab ranger would have a longer wheel base than the regular cab. Not positive on that though. I would think as long as both trucks are either regular or extend cab the bed would work without too much modification. Or you could measure to be sure.
![]() ------------------ 89GT,T-5Z, D.S.S. 306 shortblock w\main support, B-303 cam, Cobra intake, GT40P heads, 1.72rr, MAC "P" headers, MAC off-road H-Pipe, MAC true-fit w\tips, 373's...and the list goes on! Throttle Junkie Powered by Ford! 12.824 @ 107.05 MPH |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brigantine N.J. united states
Posts: 2
|
![]() Hi, check out fordf150enthusiast they have sites just for rangers. JOHN
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Ford Mustang Frame Measurements | bigmac5300 | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 10-25-2009 01:15 PM |
Flowmasters on a Ranger ? HELP ! | Mass Stang | Built Ford Tough | 2 | 07-09-2004 12:45 PM |
302 in Ranger....need info | DemonGT | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-24-2002 07:23 AM |
Blown 306 Power in a Ranger | Coupe Devil | Windsor Power | 1 | 05-31-2001 01:30 PM |
Ranger accidental "madification" help please | fiveohpatrol | Built Ford Tough | 1 | 05-15-2001 03:44 PM |