MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-28-2003, 03:45 PM   #1
Fulcrum
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Farmers Branch, Tx
Posts: 46
Question Main girdle or windage tray or both?

I'm new to the forum and would like to say hello. What brought me here is a quest for knowledge on Ford 302's. I am currently collecting parts. So far I have a set of KB Silvo-lit .030 pistons, Roush 180 cast iron heads, Manley Racemaster 1.90/1.66 valves and a Doug Herbert Cam #CF4N. Oh yeah and a '79 Mustang 5.0 garage queen with a '80 Mustang spare parts car along side it. My question's are: I understand from days long past that the bottom end of the 302 is a bit weak when compared to some other engine blocks. I see that a Steel Main Girdle is available through the catalogs. I also understand that a windage tray will increase performance. I intend to use the stock Crank and rods reinforced with ARP Bolts. Can I install the Main Girdle and the windage tray? or is it a one or the other thing as i suspect it may be. I have overhauled several engines before but this is my first "performace orintated" job. Thanks!
Fulcrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2003, 05:08 PM   #2
302 LX Eric
or '331 LX Eric'
 
302 LX Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Default

You can use both a girdle and windage tray. I'm running the DSS Main Support System and their Windage Pro Tray - both made of 6061 T6 aluminum, not steel. DSS's theory on using aluminum vs. steel is that the aluminum absorbs engine harmonics much better than steel and it's plenty strong.

Good luck, and welcome to Mustang Works!

E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles

331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials

12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60'
302 LX Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2003, 07:01 PM   #3
VeNuM
Registered Member
 
VeNuM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 464
Default

I think the idea behind it is if you crack the block, the girdle saves your rotating assembly, which steel would be better than. Aluminum would not hold up. I'm putting a steel one on mine because I do not completely believe in the "absorb" theory and I'm more worried about my rotating assembly. ~Brian
__________________
1989 Black Mustang GT Hatchback, Underdrive Pulles, Electric Fan, Cold Air Intake, Headers, Offroad H-Pipe, Magnaflow catback, Steeda Tri-Ax, Fluidyne Aluminum Radiator, Timing at 14*, 3.73's

Coming not so soon: 408w

Ricer Hater's Club Member #59
VeNuM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2003, 07:05 PM   #4
VeNuM
Registered Member
 
VeNuM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 464
Default

Btw, definately run both a girdle of some sort and a windage tray! ~Brian
__________________
1989 Black Mustang GT Hatchback, Underdrive Pulles, Electric Fan, Cold Air Intake, Headers, Offroad H-Pipe, Magnaflow catback, Steeda Tri-Ax, Fluidyne Aluminum Radiator, Timing at 14*, 3.73's

Coming not so soon: 408w

Ricer Hater's Club Member #59
VeNuM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2003, 09:54 PM   #5
BilLster
Registered Member
 
BilLster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ontario canada
Posts: 446
Default

both they serve diffrent function's they just live around the same place.
__________________
89 with 331 t3'/t4 hybrids. upr Suspention worked out finnaly . 9.89 144 mph .
BilLster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 07:39 AM   #6
Jeff Chambers
Moderator
 
Jeff Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
Default

If you do go with a windage tray, try to find a screened tray like the Moroso or Canton units. I've actually stopped using windage trays in my motors as we've found that they can actually cost you HP. We've proven this on th engine dyno. With a Canton 7-qt pan on my engines we've seen as much a 7hp more without the windage tray, presumably because the tray was bouncing the oil back onto the crank rather than allowing it to be thrown into the deep pan. Just a thought.
__________________
Jeff Chambers
1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH
14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter
CRT Performance
2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH
2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2

"There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!"
Jeff Chambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:56 AM   #7
Fulcrum
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Farmers Branch, Tx
Posts: 46
Cool

WOW! Thanks for all the info guys, most of my aquantances are die-hard chevy fans and won't talk Ford. Yet, I've always had the best luck with Fords. 'Eric, I had never seen or heard of the aluminum type. There may be something to that harmonic idea but wouldn't a good Harmonic dampner and balanced flywheel take care of that? Aluminum remains something to consider, whats the cost and where could I find that setup? I agree that there is no getting over the rigid strength of steel. I just wasn't sure if they both would fit. BTW,I also intend on using the stock oil pan. Is clearence a problem if I install both? As for the windage tray; Jeff, I can see where the screened type would have its advantages in regared to oil return but I thought the main purpose was to increase Hp by reducing the effect of the crank "splashing" through the oil. I was surprised to see that your dyno test actually showed a loss of Hp. Did your dyno also show a difference between the screen, or louvered varities or did ya'll get that far with it?
Fulcrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 11:04 AM   #8
302 LX Eric
or '331 LX Eric'
 
302 LX Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Default

The website for DSS is www.dssracing.com

E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles

331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials

12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60'
302 LX Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 08:46 PM   #9
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default

I wouldn't bother using a main girdle, unless you have expensive internals (steel crank, expensive rods, etc.). It won't stop the block from cracking, it'll only act as a seat belt to save the internals. The 5.0L ford block isn't the toughest out there, but it's no porcelain doll either. I wouldn't worry about the block until you're making over 500hp, by then you'll want to swap out the KB's for some better forged units and then you can add a girdle.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2003, 12:44 AM   #10
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default WOW

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Chambers
If you do go with a windage tray, try to find a screened tray like the Moroso or Canton units. I've actually stopped using windage trays in my motors as we've found that they can actually cost you HP. We've proven this on th engine dyno. With a Canton 7-qt pan on my engines we've seen as much a 7hp more without the windage tray, presumably because the tray was bouncing the oil back onto the crank rather than allowing it to be thrown into the deep pan. Just a thought.
So you actually get more RWHP without the Canton tray than with it? Any experience with the crank scraper? I have both and am veryu curious. I haven't made any back to back dyno pulls, but just assumed the tray and scraper actually worked as advertised.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2003, 07:51 AM   #11
Jeff Chambers
Moderator
 
Jeff Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
Default

My Canton Pro-Pan has a built-in scraper. The tests we've done were on an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno. Results are much more repeatable on the engine dyno => less variables. The screened tray did better than a solid/louvered tray, but still wasn't as good as no tray at all.
__________________
Jeff Chambers
1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH
14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter
CRT Performance
2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH
2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2

"There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!"
Jeff Chambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 04:51 PM   #12
drudis
Moderator
 
drudis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Livonia, MI, USA
Posts: 1,194
Default

I did the aluminum girdle, mostly cause I got it from a friend cheap...
Wont go into the argument of aluminum/steel, but IMOHO anything is better than nothing.
Also, it wont really make a difference in the mains till you start pushing closer to 500rwhp, which I was at 425rwhp and plan on getting closer to the 500rwhp mark this winter.
As for windage tray, if I knew now, I would have put one in last summer. Will the next time the oilpan comes off this winter.

__________________
Darius Rudis, Moderator
Corner Carvers Delight
1989 Mustang LX - Open Track Car
http://www.dariusrudis.com
drudis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stud Girdle and Windage Tray? Phantom5oh Windsor Power 9 02-21-2003 08:42 AM
Oilpan, girdle, windage tray,and crankscraper? 93 Cobra needs input Windsor Power 7 11-07-2002 09:35 PM
windage tray labor stanger8172 Windsor Power 2 01-28-2002 07:21 PM
Can someone with windage tray help me????/ swtstang Windsor Power 1 06-30-2001 07:07 PM
MAIN GIRDLE rwebb Windsor Power 0 03-10-2001 04:04 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.


SEARCH