MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-07-2005, 07:57 PM   #1
John Del
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 6
Default BBK's new intake manifold (SSI)

Has anyone tried one of these new upper\lower intake manifolds from BBK? 5.0 did a shootout of various intakes including the BBK, but used the same cam for all. Would not an intake that's designed for low-end\midrange power be better off with a cam that matches it's power band?

John
John Del is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2005, 08:39 AM   #2
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default Re: BBK's new intake manifold (SSI)

I have results of two or three tests on that intake with different combos, with one being the latest 5.0 magazine test. The BBK makes essentially the same power as a GT40 intake on a 302 or 347. If you like the looks of it - put one on, but it won't out-perform other comparable intakes.........
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2005, 09:06 AM   #3
fiveohpatrol
I'd rather be basketweaving
 
fiveohpatrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
Default Re: BBK's new intake manifold (SSI)

that thing is pathetic. Go to the junkyard and pick up an explorer intake, you'll make more power and you'll save $400-500
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516
NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft
fiveohpatrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 09:46 AM   #4
Jeff Chambers
Moderator
 
Jeff Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
Default Re: BBK's new intake manifold (SSI)

I agree completely...the BBK SSI is a waste of good aluminum. Not worth the extra trouble and expense for an intake that doesn't perform any better than a traditional long runner.
__________________
Jeff Chambers
1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH
14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter
CRT Performance
2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH
2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2

"There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!"
Jeff Chambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 12:42 PM   #5
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default Re: BBK's new intake manifold (SSI)

I think BBK will have a hard time recovering R&D, mold costs, etc on that intake. It didn't do as well as the GT40 on that 347 test in the new 5.0 mag........
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TFS Intake manifold Hozer 88GTConv Windsor Power 1 10-15-2004 03:47 PM
intake manifold cracked on my 97 GT-help! jinx6570 Modular Madness 4 12-23-2002 03:28 AM
help with intake manifold... 71grande Classic Mustangs 11 11-20-2002 11:29 PM
Power Gains w/ new intake manifold??? Blaster Windsor Power 2 10-14-2001 01:59 AM
intake manifold selection yusuf Windsor Power 0 03-05-2001 04:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.


SEARCH