© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-15-2006, 11:40 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Carlisle, IN
Posts: 48
|
vacuum secondaries or mechanical
hey what is better,vacuum secondaries or mechanical
__________________
Jack 1969 Bronco, 351 cleveland 1972 Bronco, 351 Cleveland |
02-16-2006, 05:34 PM | #2 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
Re: vacuum secondaries or mechanical
Unless you are running a big-block race engine, vacuum secondaries (using engine vacuum to pull the secondary throttle plate open) are the best way to go - which is why most aftermarket 'street' carbs are equipped with them. They are more practical for the street. However, 'bigger' carbs (750, 850 CFM) intended for big-block engines and/or race applications (usually with very high-lift cams) can be bought with mechanical secondaries if you need them.
Holley sells a secondary diaphragm spring kit that allows you to adjust the secondary opening rate, if you wish. In fact, Holley sells just about every part of their carbs except the body, a la carte. Again, check the Holley website for details. Sorry, but I also posted this reply under your original thread in error. I'm happy to answer your questions here (to the best of my knowledge) but I suggest you post these technical carb questions on the Windsor Power forum where they will receive a lot more views - and replies.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 |
02-16-2006, 10:35 PM | #3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: vacuum secondaries or mechanical
I second what Mr. 5.0 said, but especially the part about posting in the correct forum. Please read the sticky at the VERY TOP of the Blue Oval Lounge, and all will be clear. Thanks.
__________________
Capri306, Moderator The Mustang Works Online 1979 Mercury Capri 1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback 1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco |
02-16-2006, 10:43 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Carlisle, IN
Posts: 48
|
Re: vacuum secondaries or mechanical
srry about puting it in the wrong form
__________________
Jack 1969 Bronco, 351 cleveland 1972 Bronco, 351 Cleveland |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351W crankcase evacuation | jse9 | Windsor Power | 19 | 09-03-2004 12:00 AM |
Attn: PKRWUD: Compression Test Results | 95mustanggt | Windsor Power | 13 | 06-22-2004 07:34 AM |
Performer RPM | -RootS- | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-25-2003 06:24 PM |
Still Misfiring | MidNiteBlu 5.0 | Windsor Power | 17 | 12-02-2002 09:43 PM |
The benefits of a Vacuum Gauge!!! | PKRWUD | Windsor Power | 16 | 07-02-2001 09:12 PM |